The narrow re-review of fix commits 0c8e1e7d+2d4168f9 found every code fix
oracle-verified but returned NOT CLOSED on five test/doc residuals plus
three nits and a follow-up filing. All fixed:
- R1: the claimed "external-change->user-commit->SetName" regression test
for F1 (the deleted _suppressNextFieldEvent latch) never existed — the
Runtime-layer randomize test doesn't touch the page. Added
CharacterCreationUiControllerTests.SummaryNameField_RealCommitAfter
ExternalRefreshWhileUnfocused_StillReachesSetName: drives Refresh with a
revision bump + changed snapshot.Name while the field is unfocused (the
programmatic SetText path that used to arm the latch), THEN performs a
real user commit (field.SetText + field.Submit(), the actual event path),
asserting SetName receives the player's typed text.
- R2: RetailSkillFormula.CalculateChargenScore and ChargenSkillScoreResolver
had zero direct coverage (the F12(d) test substitutes skillId*10). Added
a Untrained/Trained(+5)/Specialized(+10) theory, the divisor-zero skip
path, and a six-way AttributeId theory (Str=1..Self=6) to
RetailSkillFormulaTests.cs.
- R3: RetailSkillFormula.cs's doc comment claimed "no retail-authored skill
sets MinLevel above Untrained=1" without ever reading the field — ACE's
own SkillBase.cs hedges the same field "// 1-2?". MEASURED (not assumed)
against the installed EoR dat's global SkillTable
(CharacterCreationLiveDatTests.SkillTable_MinLevelDistribution_
NeverExceedsTrained): 23 skills at MinLevel 1, 15 at MinLevel 2, zero
above 2, of 38 priced skills. ACE's hedge was right; the doc comment now
states the measured fact and leans on the structural argument (the gate
holds for Trained/Specialized under any MinLevel in {1,2}) as load-
bearing, not the unverified data claim.
- R4: filed AP-228 — the Summary/Skills skill-row KEY sources from
ItemAppraisalTextFormatter.SkillName's hardcoded English switch, where
retail's own key is DAT-sourced (SkillBase->_name via %hs,
0x0047b90f-0x0047b915) — same divergence class as AP-226 filed the same
round, reversed polarity, also present at CC4's Skills page. Softened
AP-224's "ported exactly, not simplified" claim: it only ever covered the
row's VALUE/template, never its KEY.
- R5: this commit corrects 0c8e1e7d's gate claim. "Release build zero
warnings" was false: a clean `dotnet build -c Release -t:Rebuild` shows
25 pre-existing warnings (18 in tests/AcDream.Core.Tests, 7 in
tests/AcDream.App.Tests — Composition/HostInputCameraCompositionTests.cs,
Composition/WorldRenderCompositionTests.cs,
UI/Layout/OptionsPanelLiveMountProbeTests.cs), none in any file this
campaign or its residual round touched. History is not amended; this is
the correction.
Nits: the ChargenPreviewController ctor doc now also cites
gmCGSummaryPage::Update @0x0047baa0 (the per-heritage re-derive site — 0xc
Olthoi/0xd OlthoiAcid/else — not just the one-shot InitializePage seed) as
the stronger justification for why Rebuild re-derives the zoomed-out eye
per heritage on every change. RuntimeCharacterCreationState's F2 comment
("Finish becoming a permanent no-op") reworded: the same unconditional
_verificationPending = false assignment ran pre-fix too, so Finish was
never blocked — only the response FEEDBACK vanished (no dialog, no created
character, nothing), not the request itself. Filed #404 for
ChargenSkillScoreResolver's own independent SkillTable read alongside
ChargenTableReader's (cleanup follow-up, out of this round's scope).
Ledger: CC5 flipped REVIEW-CLOSED in the campaign plan (dual-lens
architectural PASS-with-items / retail-fidelity FAIL -> F1-F14 fix round
0c8e1e7d -> narrow re-review: all code oracle-verified, residuals R1-R5
test/doc -> this commit; re-reviewer pre-authorized lead diff-check close).
This commit's own sha is recorded by a follow-up ledger-only commit,
matching 2d4168f9's own pattern.
Gates: Release build 0 errors (25 pre-existing warnings, unrelated to this
round — see R5 above); App suite 5257/3 skips (was 5242/3), 0 failed;
Runtime suite 1726/0 (unchanged); the three new/measured tests (R1, R2's
ten cases, R3) all pass individually.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
356545c530