acdream had never implemented retail's SECOND cell-membership algorithm.
CPhysicsObj::calc_cross_cells @0x00515230 tests HAS_PHYSICS_BSP_PS at
0x00515285 and jumps (0x0051528f jne 0x515305) to find_bbox_cell_list
@0x00510fc0 for a BSP-bearing object; everything below that jump is the
OTHER algorithm, CObjCell::find_cell_list, and that is all we had. Every
object, BSP-bearing or not, was routed through it.
That path's outdoor expansion is a HARD CAP of one cell in each direction.
CellTransit.AddAllOutsideCells computes minRad = radius, maxRad = 24 - radius
and adds at most the eight neighbours of the sphere's own cell, so for any
radius >= 12 m both boundary tests are unconditionally true and the result is
exactly 3x3. Widening the radius or adding a second sphere is mechanically
incapable of adding a tenth cell. The user's live probe measured the
consequence directly: standing inside a Neftet formation, inCell=2 exempt=2
reached=0 -- the geometry was not a candidate at all.
The port. AddAllOutsideCellsFromParts is CLandCell::add_all_outside_cells
@0x00533360 plus add_cell_block @0x005331d0: base landcell from the FIRST
part's own adjust_to_outside, baseX/baseY within-block, each part's authored
CGfxObj::gfx_bound_box re-fit through all eight corners
(BBox::LocalToGlobal @0x005b2120), floor(v / square_length) where
square_length = 0x7c920c = 24.0f, four accumulators seeded to zero, ONE
rectangle unioned across all parts, FILLED, in GLOBAL lcoords so it crosses
landblocks freely, clamped only to [0, 0x7f8).
BuildShadowCellSetFromParts is find_bbox_cell_list's worklist.
RegisterMultiPart dispatches on the same flag retail does, and
BuildFloodSpheres' BSP arm is deleted rather than left unreachable.
Disassembled from the PDB-paired 2013-09-06 binary, not read from Binary
Ninja: BN mis-renders four separate constructs inside add_all_outside_cells
alone -- a dropped `and eax,0xffff` on baseX, a neg/sbb/and select shown as
identically zero, a wrong get_landcell argument, and both x87 flag tests as
`unimplemented {test ah}`.
ShadowPartGeometry pairs the BSP root sphere with the authored box so no
resolver can answer one and leave the other call site to synthesize a
substitute -- the AP-156 invariant applied a second time, since that split is
what produced AP-156 and then this. The box comes from
FlatGfxObjVisualBounds, already computed by exactly CGfxObj::init_end's
algorithm and already in the prepared package: no bake change, no DAT re-read.
Cost, measured over the installed DATs before any code was written: 1,258
physics-BSP GfxObjs, cells/object p50 4, p90 4, p99 12, max 49. The port is
CHEAPER than the old 3x3 = 9 for 98.97% of them. Row totals (shapes x cells)
over all 1,031 landblocks with BSP owners fall 97,173 -> 15,607 (0.161x);
dense Arwic 0xC6A9 falls 342 -> 43. One landblock more than doubles.
Precondition confirmed before pinning any expected cell set: 0x010046D8's box
is 96 m x 96 m about cell (2,2) = 0x87640013, which independently corroborates
the 3x3-centred-there diagnosis, and its rectangle does contain 0x87640011 and
0x87640019 -- the two cells the probe measured empty.
Register: AP-156's outdoor half CLOSED and its risk column CORRECTED (it read
"extra broadphase candidates, never a missed one", which generalised the indoor
direction to the whole row and is why #334 sat inside it unnoticed). AP-159 +
issue #335 file the unported indoor arm; AD-49 records the seed-time rectangle.
Issue #336 files a fourth load-sensitive test flake seen once during the gate.
Ten tests, every one sabotage-verified in both directions across eight
mutations (dispatch, 8-corner refit, floor-vs-truncation, union-vs-per-part,
map clamp, adjust guard, landblock clamp, box-path-for-everything). The
strongest is an installed-DAT replay of the user's own probe evidence.
Suite 11,208 -> 11,218 passed / 4 skipped / 0 failed; the +10 is exactly the
new tests.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Both review lenses PASSED; this is the cleanup, not a rescue. Evidence:
docs/research/2026-08-06-ap156-review-closure.md (the review itself is
committed alongside it as the received artifact).
R1 — the load-bearing containment test could not fail. Its truth and flood
values were two hand-copies of the same expression over the same part set,
so the shortfall was algebraically identically zero for any DAT input. The
oracle is now PHYSICS-POLYGON VERTICES — a different DAT field from the
bounding sphere the builder emits, so the two sides can genuinely disagree.
Sabotage-verified three ways after full cleans: dropping the bounds centre
in production reddens it (428 Setups, worst 35.869 m on 0x0200129A, matching
an independent out-of-repo sweep exactly); dropping only the scale on the
centre reddens it (326); and corrupting the TEST's own bounds oracle reddens
it (467) where under the shipped oracle that same corruption was invisible
by algebra. Renamed accordingly. A6's stale "cap control" comment corrected:
that loop is the test's own uncapped re-implementation and cannot observe a
cap regression — the cap is covered in Core.
R2 — the population was understated. 172 is AP-152's DISPATCH population;
AP-156's is 530 BSP-bearing Setups, of which 525 have a flood sphere move
and 428 fail vertex containment before the fix (412 at a 1 cm tolerance —
the review's figure; the gap is 16 Setups between 1.4 mm and 10 mm, real
geometry). 0 fail after, at any tolerance down to zero. Corrected in the
AP-156 row, the section-3 header, the C5c handoff and two test docstrings.
Dated review artifacts are left as written — "170 of 172" was correct for
what they measured, and rewriting evidence to match a later measurement
loses provenance.
A1 — BoundsCenter = default reopened at the type what the commit closed at
the seam. Dropping the default alone would NOT have closed the review's own
scenario (a copied Cylinder call site would write Vector3.Zero explicitly
and stay green), so ShadowShape's constructor is now private and BSP shapes
are built only through ShadowShape.Bsp(..., FlatCollisionSphere localBounds),
which takes radius and centre as ONE value and scales them together. There
is no expression a caller can write that carries one and drops the other.
22 construction sites converted; the same sabotage now reddens 5 Core tests
where the review's sabotage A reached 4, because both BSP producers share
one scaling path.
A2 — #333 is real and bigger than filed, and its retail question is
answered. I disassembled CObjCell::find_obj_collisions @0x0052b750 from the
PDB-paired binary myself (check_exe_pdb.py MATCH) rather than inheriting the
claim: its only early-out is sphere_path.insert_type == INITIAL_PLACEMENT_
INSERT, then it calls FindObjCollisions on every unparented non-self shadow
object UNCONDITIONALLY. Retail has NO distance pre-filter, so acdream's
"+ movement + 2f" reach filter is an invention with no register row — filed
as AP-158, carrying the disassembly, the F_EPSILON = 0.0002 m contrast, and
the measured blast radius (118 of 477 unique installed physics-BSP GfxObjs
exceed its ~2.5 m budget, 46 exceed 5 m). Active AP rows 109 -> 110.
Recorded prominently in three places a reader will hit: TALL PROPS MAY SHOW
NO VISIBLE CHANGE UNTIL #333 LANDS, and a null result at the connected gate
is EXPECTED, not evidence against AP-156.
LOW items. R3: the comment claiming the cited evidence justified the whole
cap line is corrected, but int.MaxValue on the sorting-sphere branch stays —
capping at 1 would take Spheres[0], and retail's one sphere is
CSetup::sorting_sphere, a different DAT field; capping keeps the wrong field
AND flips the substitution under-inclusive (#98/#168 direction). AP-157
already owns it. R4: acdream scales the flood sphere where retail's
find_transit_cells never reads gfxobj_scale — added as a second residual on
AP-156. R5: retail's slack constant carried into AP-158 and #333. A3: the
per-call delegate allocation is back to a cached field, still derived from
the single bounds resolver. A5: noted; b52967de's message cannot be amended.
Gates: all 44 bin/obj deleted before every verdict-deciding build, each test
run gated on a verified "Build succeeded" in the same invocation. Release
build 0 errors / 21 pre-existing warnings. Complete suite 11,208 passed /
4 skipped / 0 failed — reconciles exactly with the e2b2d04c baseline; one
test renamed, none added, removed or skipped. Nothing conflated with the
known load-sensitive flakes #302 / #308 / #321.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
