The FA1 contract asked to "add the 8 missing fellowship entries lane B
lists" (0x0417-0x041C, 0x04DB, 0x04DC). Re-ran this table's own binary-
sweep methodology specifically for these 8 ids rather than inventing
text for them: a full-text grep of the 1.4M-line
acclient_2013_pseudo_c.txt found ZERO comparisons/case-labels against any
of the 8 anywhere in the retail client, and a manual walk of
HandleFailureEvent's own case-label sequence confirmed the switch goes
straight from case 0x416/0x41d (skipping 0x417-0x41c) and from case
0x4da/0x4dd (skipping 0x4db/0x4dc).
Conclusion: retail's Sept-2013 client has no display text for any of
these 8 ids -- they are intentionally absent from this table, not
overlooked. This contradicts the FA1 contract's premise but not lane B's
own text, which only claimed the ids were "missing" from the table (true)
and that two of them (0x0417, 0x04DB) are on ACE's live send paths (also
true) -- it never claimed retail has text for them. Two of the ids are
therefore live-but-silent gaps against a real ACE server, and acdream's
current no-display behavior for them is ALREADY retail-faithful. Adding
invented English would be exactly the class of mistake SHOULD-FIX 4
(the no-default-case rule this table's Resolve() already implements)
exists to prevent.
Documents the finding at both table gaps and adds a conformance test
(Resolve_FellowshipIdsAbsentFromHandleFailureEvent_ReturnsNoText) proving
all 8 resolve to null text, matching the existing
Format_0x051D_ReturnsNull_NoRetailCaseExists precedent.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
5f9aa16f43