Investigation: retail's growth propagation RECURSES natively too
(AddViewToPortals -> FixCellList -> AdjustCellView -> AddViewToPortals,
Ghidra 0x005a52d0/0x005a5250/0x005a5770, no depth guard) - the in-place
recursion shape is faithful; retail's safety is fast convergence. Our
depth-128 firing means slow/non-saturating growth (each lap of a portal
cycle nests one recursion level), not necessarily a true infinite loop.
Two dat-backed sweeps over the corner-building cell set could NOT
reproduce the T5 firing:
- PortalPlaneCrossings_InPlacePropagationConverges: +/-6cm eye sweep
across every portal plane, seeded from both sides.
- InCellDirectionSweep_InPlacePropagationConverges: 3024 builds, in-cell
eye grid x 8 yaw x 3 pitch (the walking-and-turning regime).
Both pass with 0 firings -> production-only ingredients suspected (full
lookup graph - one T5 firing was 0x0162, another building - and/or the
real camera path).
Armed: PortalVisibilityBuilder.ConvergenceTripwireCount (test
observable, both Build + look-in sites) + DumpPropagationChain - on the
next firing the log carries root cell, eye, per-cell frequency summary,
and the 24-entry chain tail, so the cycle's structure (A<->B ping-pong
vs 3-cycle laps) reads directly off the output. Both sweeps stay as
regression pins.
App tests: 227 green (was 225; +2 pins).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2d15084243