The last piece of QT6's own scope: r10-quest-dialogs.md §11.6's contract half.
IGameState.Contracts exposes what the client structurally knows about quests,
which — per that same research — is the tracker and nothing else. The rest of
§11.6 (chat stream, tells, give, use, confirmations) is other features and
stays out of this campaign.
A pull-through source rather than a pushed mirror. Contracts change rarely and
are already owned canonically, so a second copy would only be a thing to keep
in step; reading through means a plugin cannot observe a stale list.
Both hosts implement it. The headless one carries contract id, stage and
progress but no names — a bot has no dat access — because losing the TEXT is
expected while losing the QUEST would leave a bot silently unable to see what
it is on. Same rule covers a contract the installed dat has never heard of: it
still projects, with empty text and a correct status, rather than vanishing.
The interface member is defaulted so a host predating this campaign still
satisfies IGameState.
Two lazy catalog loads exist (the panel's and this one) rather than one shared
instance. That is deliberate: threading a shared ContractCatalog through three
composition records to avoid reading a 322-row immutable table at most twice
per session would be plumbing for no correctness or performance gain, and the
comment at the call site says so.
Campaign QT is complete; the connected user gate is owed.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The quest log is on screen. Rows come from the live tracker joined to the
authored catalog, the Status column runs QT4's port of FillProgressString, and
the detail pane shows contact, locations, description and the other timer.
Two things measured rather than assumed, each now pinned by an installed-DAT
test rather than left to the commit message:
The tab pairing is read from the authored 0x2E table, not inferred from
x-order — the FA campaign had to correct exactly that mistake, and Contracts
turns out to be the authored DEFAULT tab (0x32 = True), so opening on the
wrong one would have looked like an empty panel.
The open path needed no keybind at all. Toolbar button 0x1000055A authors
0x10000029 = 0x19 and has been sitting in ToolbarController.PanelButtonIds
since the toolbar was ported — it just had no panel behind it, so clicking it
did nothing. Registering slot 25 finished a wiring that was already
three-quarters present.
The list rebuild is revision-gated while the repeat countdown is not: nothing
on the wire changes as a cooldown runs down, so a rebuild-gated timer would
freeze on screen, and a per-frame rebuild would reset the player's scroll under
them. Both directions have a test.
Deliberately inert: the Abandon button (retail's abandon path is a
contract-registry command this campaign did not port — authored and visible,
but wiring a no-op handler would look responsive and lie), and the Journal
notes and Page List tabs, which are their own feature.
Campaign QT slices 5 and 6 of 6 — code-complete, connected gate owed.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Measuring the host layout rather than assuming changed what this slice is.
gmContractsUI is not a panel of its own: it is tab 1 of a THREE-tab "Journal"
panel at gmPanelUI slot 25, beside a notes page and a page list. Building it as
a standalone window would have produced something retail does not have, and
the mistake would only have surfaced at a visual gate.
The other two tabs are out of scope, so the expected intermediate state is a
panel with two dead tabs — recorded here so it is not filed as a defect.
Everything else the page needs is now measured out of the dats: every authored
label, the per-row child ids RefreshContractListbox writes, and the list's
scrollbar link. The list is a UiTemplateListBox, the widget OP2 already built,
so the page is binding work rather than new widget work.
LayoutDump --props now resolves StringInfo through DatStringResolver instead of
printing the type name, which is how the labels were read at all.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
H.3's roadmap line ("122 EmoteType x 39 Trigger mini-VM") describes the
SERVER's job. The retail client never stores a quest flag, never evaluates an
emote, and is never told a flag changed — so most of H.3 was never client work
at all. Measuring what we already have narrows the remaining scope to one
thing: the contract tracker, the only structured view of quest state a client
ever gets. The user confirmed NPC dialogue works live.
LayoutDump could only dump a layout you already knew the id of, but the decomp
hands you a CLASS id with no layout attached (UIElement::RegisterElementClass),
so the gap between the two was crossed by guessing. --find closes it, and it
searches the element's TYPE as well as its id because registration keys on
Type — searching only the id finds a real element with the same number and
quietly answers the wrong question, which is exactly what it did on the first
run here.
The plan records the wire layout, the panel's authored children, and
FillProgressString in full, including the three things a reimplementation
would get wrong: TimeWhenDone is never read, the countdown anchor is not on
the wire, and DescriptionProgress is a printf format rather than a string.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
