Commit graph

1 commit

Author SHA1 Message Date
Erik
ef6b7310c5 feat(quest): QT2/QT4 — the contract catalog, and retail's progress column
The wire carries an id, a stage and two timers. Every word the player reads
lives in portal.dat's ContractTable, which nothing in the tree had ever
opened — the only reference counted its entries in a CLI diagnostic. Chorizite
does decode it (322 contracts installed), which was a real question given it
declares TabooTable without decoding it.

FillProgressString @0x00498DE0 is the one real algorithm in this panel, and it
is now ported whole. Its x87 compares are the usual fcom/sahf pattern, so the
(status & 0x41) tests decode as "<= 0" rather than "< 0" — the difference
between a cooldown that expires and one that never does.

Three readings recorded as tests because each looks like a mistake:
TimeWhenDone is on the wire and is never read; an EMPTY QuestflagRepeatTime is
the entire difference between "Done" and "Available"; and DescriptionProgress
is a printf format taking stage-4, not a literal — rendering it verbatim shows
the player "%d/20 Tuskers".

DeltaTimeToString @0x00565E10 emits every part with a trailing space and then
overwrites the last one. That truncation is invisible in the decompiler output
(the instruction reads as pointer noise), so it was settled by decoding the
bytes: mov byte ptr [esp+eax+0x1b], cl with cl == 0 and eax == strlen writes
the terminator over buffer[len-1]. Guessing either way was a coin flip that
decides whether every repeat timer reads "Done (1h 30s  to Repeat)".

The single-%d substitution is a MEASUREMENT, not a convenience: 89 of the 322
installed contracts author a progress format and every one uses exactly one
specifier. An installed-DAT test asserts that, so a future dat that ships two
fails there rather than silently rendering a raw specifier.

LayoutDump gained --contracts, which is how all of the above was measured.

Campaign QT slices 2 and 4 of 6.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-21 14:53:21 +02:00