Commit graph

2 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Erik
c68ad1e646 fix(vendor): 6b/6c review corrections — pre-send guards, accumulating staging, trade-note exemption, drag-over tab switch, full-stack sells
Some checks are pending
Headless portability / portable-headless (ubuntu-latest) (push) Waiting to run
Headless portability / portable-headless (windows-latest) (push) Waiting to run
Headless portability / linux-graphical (push) Waiting to run
Headless portability / linux-vulkan (push) Waiting to run
All thirteen findings, each anchored in recovered bytes or pc reads:

Buy All now runs retail's four PRE-SEND guards in order (pyreal and
alt-currency affordability, container and item slot capacity; strings
recovered from .rdata at 0x007b57b4/0x007b5750) — a rejected batch can
no longer destroy the staged list. Staged adds ACCUMULATE with the
5000 cap ("I can't possibly sell you that much!..." @0x007b59d8) and
the shop rows decrement/restore per RemoveFromShop. The max-value sell
rejection exempts trade notes — the raw bytes at 0x005d1add are `not`
(bitwise), not the pseudo-C's misleading `!`, and the early ret skips
the min check too. BF_RETAINED gates selling end to end (the bit was
already on ClientObject; AP-164's three claims were all false once
traced — RETIRED). Dragging over the vendor window auto-opens the
Selling tab per UpdateDragOver — with a correction to the review's own
citation: token 0x100000cd is the SELLING page, the guard is
"don't reopen the current tab." Sells are full-stack-only (three
retail sites; "Cannot sell part of a stack" @0x007b57ec) and Sell Item
acts on the global selection unconditionally. The confirm string gains
its byte-true trailing '?', dies with the session, staged-row
highlights repaint, dead guids unstage with retail's shopping-list
notice, and move-to-use no longer walks to targets the dispatch would
refuse.

AP-162 narrowed, AP-164 retired, AP-167/AP-168 filed honest.

Clean-room complete solution: 11,508 passed / 4 skipped / 0 failed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-08 12:50:28 +02:00
Erik
92ea3977b6 feat(vendor): Slice 6b/6c — move-to-use, buy staging, selling; the vendor arc is functionally complete
Some checks are pending
Headless portability / portable-headless (ubuntu-latest) (push) Waiting to run
Headless portability / portable-headless (windows-latest) (push) Waiting to run
Headless portability / linux-graphical (push) Waiting to run
Headless portability / linux-vulkan (push) Waiting to run
C1 an out-of-range Use now approaches first via the existing
client-predicted BeginApproach (Pickup's far-range shape mirrored;
retail's ItemHolder::UseObject @0x00588A80 has no range check and the
dispatch stays immediate). C2 Add-to-List stages into the Buying tab
via VendorStagingList (RemoveProfileFromList's two shapes,
pc:200497-200537), Buy All sends ONE batched 0x005F and flushes
staging on send exactly as retail does (SendShopEvent -> Flush,
pc:204075-204076 — not UseDone-gated), and X-close over a non-empty
staging list shows retail's confirm string recovered verbatim from the
binary data segment (0x007b5bd8) through the existing dialog factory.
C3 the Selling tab's list is the sole drop target (retail's single
IsAncestorOfMe gate, pc:204229-204246); VendorSellAcceptability ports
InqAcceptability with all rejection strings recovered verbatim from
the raw data segment; the sell side prices with BuyPrice (retail's
inverted naming: what the vendor PAYS) and 0x0060 carries no trailing
currency field, unlike Buy. C4 the status-bar reproduction test PASSES
against the production toolbar mount — retail's toolbar shows count +
name with the split bar and NO price parenthetical (that figure is the
vendor row's own cost text); no code change, the live gate referees.
C5 pack order verified correct, untouched.

Register: AP-161 narrowed to its two pre-existing cosmetic gaps;
AP-162 extended over Buy All; AP-164 (non-sellable bitfield
unmodeled), AP-165 (DescStackSize for _maxStackSize in the removal
test, bounded), AP-166 (purse text + pending-sell highlight cosmetic)
filed.

Clean-room complete solution: 11,482 passed / 4 skipped / 0 failed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-08 11:43:11 +02:00