Commit graph

1 commit

Author SHA1 Message Date
Erik
18289f95f8 docs: #345 D0 verdict — the stuck-tick fingerprint is retail's own algorithm; fix attempt correctly stopped
Five links traced from the named decomp: the below-push never executes
(OnWalkable guard — the probe printed the wrong guard pair), the
from-scratch retry is retail-identical, and validate_transition's
failure path manufactures every captured field including the (0,0,1)
default. Stopping dead may simply BE retail. Two validations remain:
the user observing their RETAIL client at a comparable slope (the
cheapest decisive test there is), and — only if retail visibly
slides — the find_cell_list broadphase question via the cdb toolchain.
The mechanism paragraph's wrong-cause framing is retained and
corrected in place, per the register's own honesty pattern.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-07 11:11:19 +02:00