Record attempt 1's shader-source-hash contract conflict and permit only the deterministic manifest/paired vertex-SPIR-V closure needed by the required comment correction.
Start attempt 1/5 as an evidence-and-comment-only repair of a094bf2b7. Preserve behavior, assertions, shader/SPIR-V, register, package, sequential review, and no-landing-before-dual-PASS constraints.
Record a094bf2b7 as behaviorally retail-clean but unlanded because the binding evidence/prose contract failed. Preserve the sequential-review stop: the production lens did not run, no graphical gate ran, and G3/G4 remain unpassed.
Record the owner override after the required stop and bind the one-attempt repair to exact EnvCell pass membership, retail CLIP state, bounded source scratch, and production-path discriminators. Keep G3/G4 unpassed and the implementation unlanded pending dual review.
The 'empty plane under fog' frame the S4-c1 capture-pose self-gates produced
at frame 15 is the terrain seen from below by a falling player, not a draw
change: the camera probe holds playerCell=0xA9B4013F at (134.07,17.36) while
z drops 96 -> -20 m after materialization. The S3-state run had seated the
same request outdoors in 0xA9B40029 and stood. Placement is not the campaign's
domain; the gate pose is moved so the G3 frame is deterministic and the
original pose is kept in the issue as the reproduction. #462 recurrence on
the pre-S4 control build noted.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The two-list/router/flush core of 048d5b12f is exact at the bytes; the
failures are at the call sites (a data-driven row 5 turned into a throw;
detail-surface input hardcoded false while the drain applies detail),
the register (the structurally empty CLIP list is undeclared; AP-237's
example is wrong; AP-34 not retired by convention), the first-for-list
quantifier, the all-KnownFailure gate, and the skipped C4 that turns out
to be bounded.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Written for a fresh session on another account: read order, exact tips and
worktrees, what S1-S4-c1 landed with their proof, how to find the state of
the chunk 2 implementer dispatched this morning, the #464 attribution plan
(RenderDoc pixel history on the scripted artifact frame - the lead's own
job once ACE is up), the Holtburg doorway frame read, tooling gotchas, and a
paste-prompt.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The 2026-09-03 session landed S4 chunk 1 at 766f9e749 but ran out of
credits before writing the ledger row: round-2 lens verdicts, the landing
gates, the two capture-pose self-gates whose Holtburg doorway frame came
up as an empty plane under fog, the lead's read of that frame (the client
seated the player in the house-interior cell at the doorway threshold, so
the frame roots indoors with the eye outside), the crashed pre-S4 control,
and the S4-c2 dispatch that died with no commit.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Retail admits exactly acdream's cells and building-portal groups in the
same order; its alpha-depth frame punches each portal polygon to far depth
right before that group's cells and seals the exit views last. The
capture becomes S4-c1's fifth transcript pose.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The frame is saved as logs/464-owner-tilted-frame.walk.txt. Narrowed to
the building shell versus interior-cell order/clip at the stairwell's open
face in the outside pass (S4), with a possible building-portal admission
component only the cathedral-stair-arch retail capture can settle.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The automation cannot tilt the camera, so the owner's screenshot stays the
record of the frame; the transcript shows the interior root flood of the
three stacked stair cells with six outside views and fifteen building-
portal groups including the hall cells. The retail capture at this pose
decides depth (S4) versus admission.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Owner client with both probes: root 0xF4180114, eye (39.89,17.25,182.36),
sweep uncontacted; the hall's interior shows above the bottom arch where
retail shows the solid far face, which the DAT gives as five exit portals.
The retail capture cathedral-stair-arch is requested as the fix oracle.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The eye is legitimate (retail's sweep passes the same opening); the defect
is the draw of the stairwell cells seen back through the building's
exterior portals. Matrix row invariant re-worded; the one retail capture
to request is the oh-capture walk + alphadepth at exactly this eye.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Drafted from the five alphadepth captures (10,556 AM lines, every clip=0;
FL by return address 13,705 / 309 / 18 / 23) and the OH1 alpha-list
contract. Dispatch waits for S4-c1 to land.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Four probe-on self-gate rounds (run/zoom/tilt/mid) with the camera cell,
root and eye logged every frame: sweep ok, eye in root, no fallback, in
every frame. The DAT shows 0xF4180113/0xF4180114 are one stairwell split
horizontally; the zoomed-out eye stops 0.31 m in front of 0x114's
nine-vertex EXIT portal. Owner asked for one probe-on reproduction.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The held-forward route captured the owner's running symptom: the first frame
after the press has the chase camera above and outside the stairwell, the
next is clean. Same defect as the zoom-out. The runs also showed the
character running in place at one corridor spot for 5+ s (#467, movement,
outside the campaign).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Rounds ff607a1e0 + 7df0b94c9 delete the union-AABB scissor fallback, the
sky's doorway scissor bracket and the TerrainClip UBO; AD-17 now describes
the two surviving portal-polygon clips and their overflow behavior, and
AP-117 records that the walk's ported landcell_check feeds the production
particle in-view state. The three-lens re-review is owed post-hoc (API
overload); the lead's item-by-item verification is in the ledger.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
