Correct packet section 18.7 mutation 9: renaming AP-241 first fails the earlier AP-table-boundary Assert.True with rowIndex=-1; the later Assert.Single is not reached. Advance only the S4-c3a ledger row to the owner-authorized evidence-exception review.
This commit explicitly supersedes the false mutation-9 sentence recorded in historical candidate commit 44e2bc227b without rewriting or amending that commit. It changes no other c3a evidence or renderer behavior.
Narrow mutation: AP-241 rename first failed at line 329 with 'AP-241 row must be inside the AP table before the TS section; rowIndex=-1, AP=[275116,751256).'. The register row was restored byte-identically and the same isolated test passed 1/1. Diff-check passed; only packet and plan changed; no graphical client.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Retain the GfxObj-authored SortCenter independently from the rendered AABB center and use its scaled, oriented world point for billboard/mode-2-5 CYpt. Keep the visual center unchanged.
Reserve prepared source payload only at Append, roll back the exact tail once on false or exception, cap retained preparation at 3000 CLIP plus 3000 ALPHA, preserve immediate duplicates, account the bounded scratch, and correct the static-record ordering comment. The lead-authorized plan edit records candidate 44e2bc227b's retail FAIL and this section 19 result.
Gates: Release solution build 0 warnings/0 errors; focused particle/driver/queue/order/bounds 95/95; register boundary/count 1/1; real allocations 2/2 at 0 B; shader/manifest 32/32; one-shot hermetic 16751/16751; InstalledDat 385 pass/10 documented fail/1 skip; diff-check pass. No graphical client.
Mutations: rendered pos first failed distance expected 40 actual 116; AABB center expected 40 actual 116; dropped size expected 40 actual 65; dropped orientation expected 40 actual 160; eager reservation first failed Assert.Empty with one payload; omitted false rollback first failed Assert.Single with two payloads; omitted exception rollback first failed Assert.Empty with one payload; removed caps first failed prepared count expected 6000 actual 6002.
Evidence note: the first ordinary InstalledDat filter produced 385 pass/2 expected fail/1 skip but excluded the eight required KnownFailure rows; the separate inclusive no-retry artifact produced the exact documented 10-failure set. Initial test fixture compilation/analyzer setup failures are recorded in packet section 19.5.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Record attempt 1's shader-source-hash contract conflict and permit only the deterministic manifest/paired vertex-SPIR-V closure needed by the required comment correction.
Start attempt 1/5 as an evidence-and-comment-only repair of a094bf2b7. Preserve behavior, assertions, shader/SPIR-V, register, package, sequential review, and no-landing-before-dual-PASS constraints.
Record a094bf2b7 as behaviorally retail-clean but unlanded because the binding evidence/prose contract failed. Preserve the sequential-review stop: the production lens did not run, no graphical gate ran, and G3/G4 remain unpassed.
Record the owner override after the required stop and bind the one-attempt repair to exact EnvCell pass membership, retail CLIP state, bounded source scratch, and production-path discriminators. Keep G3/G4 unpassed and the implementation unlanded pending dual review.
The 'empty plane under fog' frame the S4-c1 capture-pose self-gates produced
at frame 15 is the terrain seen from below by a falling player, not a draw
change: the camera probe holds playerCell=0xA9B4013F at (134.07,17.36) while
z drops 96 -> -20 m after materialization. The S3-state run had seated the
same request outdoors in 0xA9B40029 and stood. Placement is not the campaign's
domain; the gate pose is moved so the G3 frame is deterministic and the
original pose is kept in the issue as the reproduction. #462 recurrence on
the pre-S4 control build noted.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The two-list/router/flush core of 048d5b12f is exact at the bytes; the
failures are at the call sites (a data-driven row 5 turned into a throw;
detail-surface input hardcoded false while the drain applies detail),
the register (the structurally empty CLIP list is undeclared; AP-237's
example is wrong; AP-34 not retired by convention), the first-for-list
quantifier, the all-KnownFailure gate, and the skipped C4 that turns out
to be bounded.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Written for a fresh session on another account: read order, exact tips and
worktrees, what S1-S4-c1 landed with their proof, how to find the state of
the chunk 2 implementer dispatched this morning, the #464 attribution plan
(RenderDoc pixel history on the scripted artifact frame - the lead's own
job once ACE is up), the Holtburg doorway frame read, tooling gotchas, and a
paste-prompt.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The 2026-09-03 session landed S4 chunk 1 at 766f9e749 but ran out of
credits before writing the ledger row: round-2 lens verdicts, the landing
gates, the two capture-pose self-gates whose Holtburg doorway frame came
up as an empty plane under fog, the lead's read of that frame (the client
seated the player in the house-interior cell at the doorway threshold, so
the frame roots indoors with the eye outside), the crashed pre-S4 control,
and the S4-c2 dispatch that died with no commit.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Retail admits exactly acdream's cells and building-portal groups in the
same order; its alpha-depth frame punches each portal polygon to far depth
right before that group's cells and seals the exit views last. The
capture becomes S4-c1's fifth transcript pose.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The frame is saved as logs/464-owner-tilted-frame.walk.txt. Narrowed to
the building shell versus interior-cell order/clip at the stairwell's open
face in the outside pass (S4), with a possible building-portal admission
component only the cathedral-stair-arch retail capture can settle.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The automation cannot tilt the camera, so the owner's screenshot stays the
record of the frame; the transcript shows the interior root flood of the
three stacked stair cells with six outside views and fifteen building-
portal groups including the hall cells. The retail capture at this pose
decides depth (S4) versus admission.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Owner client with both probes: root 0xF4180114, eye (39.89,17.25,182.36),
sweep uncontacted; the hall's interior shows above the bottom arch where
retail shows the solid far face, which the DAT gives as five exit portals.
The retail capture cathedral-stair-arch is requested as the fix oracle.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The eye is legitimate (retail's sweep passes the same opening); the defect
is the draw of the stairwell cells seen back through the building's
exterior portals. Matrix row invariant re-worded; the one retail capture
to request is the oh-capture walk + alphadepth at exactly this eye.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Drafted from the five alphadepth captures (10,556 AM lines, every clip=0;
FL by return address 13,705 / 309 / 18 / 23) and the OH1 alpha-list
contract. Dispatch waits for S4-c1 to land.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Four probe-on self-gate rounds (run/zoom/tilt/mid) with the camera cell,
root and eye logged every frame: sweep ok, eye in root, no fallback, in
every frame. The DAT shows 0xF4180113/0xF4180114 are one stairwell split
horizontally; the zoomed-out eye stops 0.31 m in front of 0x114's
nine-vertex EXIT portal. Owner asked for one probe-on reproduction.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The held-forward route captured the owner's running symptom: the first frame
after the press has the chase camera above and outside the stairwell, the
next is clean. Same defect as the zoom-out. The runs also showed the
character running in place at one corridor spot for 5+ s (#467, movement,
outside the campaign).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
