A player-parented child never received a canonical cell. Its FullCellId stayed
0 for its whole attached lifetime, so it could not follow the player across a
boundary. Scope was wider than the local player: every REMOTE player's
equipment too.
ROOT CAUSE. EquippedChildRenderController hardcoded ParentInstanceSequence: 0
for a parented CreateObject. Correct for creatures and statics, which really
are sequence 0; wrong for players, whose ObjectInstance is Character.TotalLogins
(ACE Player_Networking.cs:37). The relation filed under (playerGuid, 0) while
the record carried TotalLogins, so both route-7 write sites — D1's attach
re-cell and D2's propagation lookup — keyed on an incarnation that never
matched. TryCommitParent did not validate the sequence, so the attach
succeeded and printed normally. Silent.
A ROUTE 7 REGRESSION (cd3129e9) that un-masked a latent bug: the TickChild call
route 7 deleted was keyed on the child guid alone and was structurally immune
to a wrong parent key.
THE FIX IS TO STOP TREATING PLAYERS DIFFERENTLY, not to special-case them.
Retail's attach path is guid-only end to end — PhysicsDesc::get_parent_id
@0x00558a18 -> CObjectMaint::GetObjectA @0x00558a2d -> set_parent @0x00558a3e,
with SetChildren @0x00509370 hash-walking by guid — and neither set_parent
overload (@0x00515A90, @0x00515B50) nor enter_cell @0x00510ED0 contains any
player test or instance-sequence read. Our player/non-player split was purely
an artifact of keying relations by (guid, incarnation) against a wire message
that carries no parent incarnation. Late-binding to whoever currently holds the
guid is retail's own semantics. Fixed at BOTH producers: OnSpawn and
OnCreateParentAccepted, the second carrying the byte-identical defect and not
named in the contract's scope line.
THE INVARIANT IS EQUALITY, NOT FRESHNESS. The contract rejected both framings I
offered: every one of the 45 FullCellId liveness predicates excludes a
committed child on a NON-cell clause first, so the child inherits only the
parent record's existing staleness, which is already present today with no
symptom. The key fix alone restores child-equals-parent for every parent class.
TWO SITES GATED, inert only because the cell was zero and would have woken
wrongly: the hydration candidate loop (a nonzero-cell child would take the
legacy RebucketLiveEntity -> CommitRebucket, a second canonical writer — route
7's exact defect class) and RestoreShadow (would install a broadphase row for
the weapon, the #184 shape, contradicting route 7's P4). Retail anchor:
update_object's parent != 0 early-out @0x00515D40 — children are never
independently re-placed.
THREE MAJORS WERE FIXED BY DELETION. The first pass added a deferral queue for
an unaddressable parent, carrying a missing child-freshness gate (A2), a
sentinel-0 collision with the generation filters (A3), and unbounded
accumulation (A5). Both reviewers then proved the deferred branch unreachable
for BOTH producers — RegisterEntityCore defers the entire CreateObject one
layer above, reading the same ?? chain, and CreateParentUpdate is produced only
inside AcceptCreateCore, after that gate passes. The machinery was deleted
rather than repaired, and the diff SHRANK to 76 added / 13 removed from 91/24
while gaining the A1 fix. Retail confirmed the deletion does not diverge:
acdream's real port of retail's per-guid replay (QueueBlobForObject) is a
different, untouched layer, and the deleted queue was a third redundant one
downstream of it.
THE GUARD MUST NOT TEAR WHAT IT PROTECTS. The first pass threw
InvalidOperationException AFTER the canonical half had committed, so the one
time it fired it left the child parented with no committed relation and a
staged one blocking Resolve — a torn transaction, the exact outcome the
contract pinned against. Now a pure CanCommitIncarnation precondition checked
BEFORE the commit at both sites, with a logged refusal instead of a throw.
Route 3's N3 principle (do not make a transient fatal on a host that must
survive 30 sessions x 2 hours) reinforces it, but the tearing argument stands
alone.
TEST QUALITY, the recurring lesson in its most refined form. The A1 test
initially passed sabotage FOR THE WRONG REASON: a mismatched ChildPositionSequence
meant TryCommitParent's own gate refused in either ordering, so the three
assertions carrying A1's meaning passed both ways and only an incidental
staging assertion failed. It failed on stranding, not tearing. Corrected, the
sabotage now names line 925 — Assert.Null(snapshot.ParentGuid), with the
parent's guid in it — proving the canonical mutation happened before the catch.
"Fails under sabotage" is necessary, not sufficient; WHICH assertion fails is
the real question.
The dual parent-class matrix (player 0x5… incarnation > 1 vs creature 0x8…
incarnation 0, identical outcomes, sabotage-verified in both directions) is the
structural fix for how this survived a full dual review and two connected
sessions: every prior test and both captured gate logs used sequence-0 parents.
Register: AP-142 clause (f); AP-132 amended to distinguish the two producers;
new row AP-146 for the local player's coarse canonical cell (retail writes it
per tick at SetPositionInternal @0x00515330 — which, per the retail review, ALSO
walks this->children writing each child's objcell_id @0x005153AE-@0x005153D8,
so retail's per-tick child propagation lives in the same function). That
divergence had no row at all, a standing rule-1 violation now corrected.
Follow-up #320 filed for making the player's cell track ordinary movement —
deliberately excluded here: it touches the landblock-preserve contract, the
Rebucketed cadence, route-2/4b-3 classification inputs AP-136/AP-138 spent four
review rounds pinning, and the portal-space frozen-source-cell race.
Two dual review rounds; 6 architecture MAJORs and 2 retail MAJORs closed.
Diagnostic refusals are latched per child guid and the latch clears on
Clear()/RemoveChild, so a recycled guid's next incarnation still logs rather
than being silently suppressed.
Complete Release suite MEASURED at 11,112 passed / 4 skipped / 0 failed
(baseline 11,090 at 52175aa1, +22). Neither known flake fired.
STILL OWED: the connected gate, with the CORRECTED positive criterion — assert
the equipped child's FullCellId EQUALS the parent's after a crossing (a zero is
a failure, not a silence), run with BOTH a player and a creature parent, plus
the new step carrying an armed creature across a landblock unload/reload.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Retail re-cells children when their parent crosses a cell, recursively, to
unbounded depth. acdream did it from a RENDER tick, so headless parented
children were cell-less forever and the canonical cell had two writers. This
slice makes Runtime the sole authority and demotes App's tick to
presentation-only. Contract:
docs/research/2026-08-04-c4-route-7-contract.md; the research that unblocked
it is docs/research/2026-08-04-retail-parent-cell-propagation.md (ca96ea5e).
Retail: SetPositionInternal @0x00515330 branches on `this->cell == curr_cell`
@0x0051536d; the changed branch reaches change_cell @0x00513390, whose
delegates leave_cell @0x00510f50 and enter_cell @0x00510ed0 self-recurse over
children and write the FULL identity (add_object @0x00510ee2, objcell_id
@0x00510f1e, part-array cell id @0x00510f2b, cell pointer @0x00510f35).
change_cell itself has no child loop.
THE TRAP, recorded because it nearly shipped: the depth-1 loop
@0x0051539c-0x005153d8 is the SAME-CELL fast path (objcell_id and part-array
id only, deliberately not the cell pointer), NOT the propagation. An
implementer who finds it first concludes "depth-1, id-only" and strands every
equipped item at a landblock boundary — the #184 class. The clincher against
that reading: update_object @0x00515d10 early-returns on `parent != 0`
@0x00515d40, so a child never runs its own physics tick and parent
propagation is the ONLY mechanism maintaining its cell.
Route 7 performs NO placement (DoPickupEvent @0x00452240 = unset_parent +
leave_world; DoParentEvent @0x00452290 = set_parent + SetPlacementFrame), so
it arms ConstrainTo nowhere — the leash rule INVERTS relative to routes
2/4/5, and both reviewers confirmed nothing arms.
Propagation is an ITERATIVE WORKLIST, not recursion. The first implementation
recursed with a depth-64 cap; both reviews independently found the cap left a
truncated tail at a stale NON-ZERO cell — permanently unrecoverable, logged
only under a probe flag, and on the withdraw path exactly the #184 shape
AP-142 clause (a) exists to reject. Shipping a fresh #184 instance inside the
slice that fixes stranded children was not acceptable, so the cap was removed
rather than tuned. The worklist retires the cap, the constant, its register
clause, and the failure mode together. Termination: every record on the stack
is already at the target pair, so nothing can be pushed twice and a hostile
A->B->A cycle collapses without a visited set.
The child write deliberately bypasses the public RuntimeEntityDirectory
.SetFullCell and calls the record method directly. This is LOAD-BEARING:
the public method re-enters PropagateFullCellToChildren, which opens with
_propagationWorklist.Clear() — routing children through it mid-drain would
wipe the shared stack and silently drop every unprocessed sibling. Any future
side effect added to the public SetFullCell must be mirrored by hand at that
call site.
Deliberate divergence, recorded not disguised: retail's removal path leaves
children with a null cell pointer but a STALE nonzero objcell_id @0x005133c1.
acdream does not reproduce it, because FullCellId != 0 is the liveness
predicate at 45+ sites — faithful porting would mark dead children live.
AP-142 records this; clause (d) records that acdream cannot gate propagation
on HasPartArray the way enter_cell gates on part_array @0x00510ed8, because
the flag's only writers are graphical and headless never sets it — the reason
is Slice J LAYERING, not a semantic difference (retail's part_array is itself
a mesh-construction product, single assignment site makeAnimObject
@0x0050e930 -> CPartArray::CreateSetup @0x0050e93e).
D7 adopts retail's unset_parent-before-leave_world order @0x0045227f ->
@0x00452286, applied to BOTH pickup paths including the dormant executor
replay. Its inertness was verified by reverting it and finding all 12
propagation tests still green — reported honestly rather than papered over
with a manufactured test, and independently confirmed by both reviewers.
ClassifyLeaveWorld and its request/cause types are DELETED: retail has no
classification here, and method-per-cause IS the retail dispatch shape.
Wiring it would have forced a vacuous teleport-sequence predicate with the
#307 shape.
Two review rounds plus a coordinator-required third pass; 5 MAJORs. One was a
handoff failure worth recording: enter_cell's part_array guard was correctly
identified as load-bearing by the research, dropped by the contract when it
enumerated the writes, and inherited as an omission by the code — a right
finding that evaporated across two handoffs with nobody re-reading the source.
Another was a test that survived deleting the entire behaviour it claimed to
pin, because its assertion read a field written unconditionally one line
earlier.
NoProjection is structurally unreachable from TickChild (TryResolveExactAttachment
performs a strictly stronger form of the same guard one call earlier). Kept as
a fail-safe, unit-tested directly, and documented in two places rather than
wrapped in a fabricated end-to-end test.
Headless regression test — the direct gate for this defect, which FAILED
before this work because no code path existed:
RuntimeLiveEntitySessionControllerTests
.DirectSink_D5_StandaloneParentEventCommitsChildToParentsExactCell.
Probe: ACDREAM_PROBE_CHILD_CELL=1 emits [child-cell] lines at all four write
sites (attach / headless-attach / propagate / withdraw / delete). TEMPORARY.
Complete Release suite MEASURED at 11,079 passed / 4 skipped / 0 failed
(baseline 11,063 at cff52c44, +16). An allocation flake appeared once under
load and was proven NOT this slice by reachability — RuntimeCollisionReportingState
contains zero SetFullCell and zero ParentAttachments references.
STILL OWED: the two-client connected gate (equip/unequip, carry across
landblock boundaries, pickup, loot, reconnect) with ACDREAM_PROBE_CHILD_CELL=1,
and a session counts only if [child-cell] cause=propagate lines appear.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Erik