Commit graph

2 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Erik
5660f3483d docs(motion): #39 — candidate fix ineffective; refute Shift-toggle wire hypothesis
Visual-verify of commit 8fa04af in launch-39-candidate.log refutes the
static-analysis hypothesis that retail does not broadcast UMs on
HoldKey-only changes. The log shows:

- [FWD_WIRE] for retail actor 0x50000001 contains many direct Walk↔Run
  transitions (0x44000007 ↔ 0x45000005). ACE IS sending UMs on Shift
  toggle.
- [SETCYCLE] fires correctly per UM; Sequencer.CurrentMotion cycles
  through Walk / Run / Turn / Sidestep correctly per [UM_RAW].
- [UPCYCLE_PLAYER] never fired — UM grace correctly suppressed it
  (UMs at >2 Hz, well within 500 ms grace).
- User reports legs visually stuck in walking animation despite the
  wire/sequencer saying Run.

Conclusion: bug is downstream of Sequencer.CurrentMotion — same as
2026-05-03 hypothesis F. Most likely _currNode lands on the walk-to-run
transition link after SetCycle (`currNodeIsCyclic=False` confirmed in
[SCFULL]) and Advance does not progress past it to the cycle.

The candidate fix code (LastUMTime, ApplyPlayerLocomotionRefinement,
hysteresis constants, un-gated call site) is left in place — harmless
because UM grace blocks the velocity-fallback path while UMs arrive,
and the infrastructure may be useful for cases #2–#7 if those need
velocity fallback. But it does not close case #1.

Updates ISSUES.md #39 with refuted hypothesis + new evidence + next
step pointer. findings-static.md gains "Visual-verify result" §
documenting the diagnostic dump and recommending the next investigation
target be AnimationSequencer.Advance queue-handling.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-06 07:21:42 +02:00
Erik
8fa04af4c7 fix(motion): #39 candidate — un-gate UP velocity-cycle for player remotes (forward only)
Adds a player-remote velocity-fallback path to ApplyServerControlledVelocityCycle
so that when retail (the actor) toggles Shift while holding W and acdream is
the observer, the visible leg cycle switches Run↔Walk within ~200–500 ms even
though no fresh UM arrives. Static analysis (ACE GameActionMoveToState +
MovementData.cs auto-upgrade + acdream's prior diag traces) suggests retail
does NOT broadcast a fresh MoveToState on HoldKey-only changes — acdream's
UMs handle direction-key changes and our local +Acdream's transitions, but
retail-driven actors leave the cycle stuck.

Changes (all in src/AcDream.App/Rendering/GameWindow.cs):
- New RemoteMotion.LastUMTime field, stamped in OnLiveMotionUpdated
- ApplyServerControlledVelocityCycle: removed inner IsPlayerGuid gate;
  routes player remotes to new ApplyPlayerLocomotionRefinement
- ApplyPlayerLocomotionRefinement (forward-direction only):
  - 500 ms UM grace window (UMs win when fresh)
  - Forward-direction-only (low byte 0x05 / 0x07)
  - Hysteresis: Run → Walk demote at < 4.5 m/s; Walk → Run promote > 5.5 m/s
  - Skip SetCycle when neither motion ID nor speedMod changed meaningfully
  - [UPCYCLE_PLAYER] diag gated on ACDREAM_REMOTE_VEL_DIAG=1
- Outer call site in OnLivePositionUpdated un-gated (!IsPlayerGuid removed);
  per-remote routing now lives inside the function

Scope: case #1 (Run↔Walk forward) only. Cases #2–#7 (backward, sidestep
speed-buckets, direction-flips) remain deferred — PlanFromVelocity is
forward-only and its NPC-tuned thresholds (RunThreshold=1.25) do not
separate player Walk (~2.5 m/s) from player Run (~9 m/s); a TTD trace
of retail's per-direction algorithm should ground the wider fix.

ISSUES.md #39 updated with progress; investigation-prompt.md and a new
findings-static.md committed under
docs/research/2026-05-06-locomotion-cycle-transitions/ (the prompt was
authored on a parallel branch in commit 7a38da3 and is brought into this
worktree here so the next session can find it without branch-hopping).

Build clean. The 8 pre-existing test failures on this branch
(BSPStepUpTests.C3_Path6_AirborneMoverHitsSteepSlope, MotionInterpreter
WalkBackward GetMaxSpeed, etc.) are unrelated to this change — verified
by running them with the diff stashed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-06 06:34:20 +02:00