Closes#312 as user-confirmed, with the caveat recorded rather than buried: the
accepting session's probe capture showed 22 parks and zero park-restores, so the
restoration path was not observed executing. If an invisible-remote report
recurs, that is where to start.
Re-scopes #309 as largely superseded by #312 — the presentation restore is the
behaviour its connected check was written to probe. What survives is the
narrower faithfulness question: retail's GotoLostCell keeps a lost-cell object
hidden until reenter_visibility, where acdream re-shows it on cancel.
Adds the handoff itself: branch state and the measured 11,027 baseline, the two
known flakes and the standing instruction not to conflate them, per-route
scope with the retail addresses and the traps already paid for (teleport_hook
runs BEFORE the placement; route 5 has no possible live gate because ACE never
sends UpdatePosition for a missile; route 6 needs zero production lines and the
campaign plan carries a false premise about create-time effects; route 7 must
write the child cell at BOTH the set_parent analog and the per-commit position
analog), and the six process rules this session paid for — chiefly that the
contract causes the defect, that a slice must split on discovery, and that a
green suite and a clean-looking live session are both non-evidence.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
