Commit graph

7 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Erik
af5d424df0 docs: T5 comprehensive gate verdict - PARTIAL PASS; #108/#109/#97 closed, #117-#120 filed
The single comprehensive visual gate (2026-06-11, user-driven):

CONFIRMED (user axioms): doors block both ways incl. off-center (#99
visual pass), cellar descent/ascent clean + #108 grass-sweep GONE, inn
2nd floor clean (#97 CLOSED), interiors stable through doorways incl.
edge-on, #109 far-door oscillation GONE, formerly-popping stairs now
stable at all ranges. The entire T6/BR-7 collision port passed 100%.

REMAINING (render, filed at mechanism level - no live whack-a-mole):
- #117 aperture-shaped see-through: doors/interiors visible through
  terrain hills and through nearer buildings (the far-Z punch erases
  occluder depth at aperture pixels). Decomp direction:
  DrawPortalPolyInternal depth state vs draw order.
- #118 character clipped + vanishes momentarily on house exit
  (viewer-indoor/player-outdoor transition frames; local-player
  partition / aperture-clip suspects).
- #119 old-tower stairs partially invisible + extraneous water barrel
  (pre-existing); T5-log lead: [up-null] 0x010002B4 + 0x010008A8
  cached EMPTY render data, permanently invisible.
- #120 [pv-ERROR] in-place propagation tripwire at depth 128 on the
  cottage interior cells (T2 convergence invariant break, self-detected
  during the gate) - investigate FIRST.

Rain-indoors not verifiable (clear weather).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-11 15:46:30 +02:00
Erik
60c10707a3 docs: T6 (BR-7) ship closeout - #99/#90 closed, #97 likely-closed note, #116 filed, plan stamped
- ISSUES.md: #99 DONE (per-cell shadow architecture, dbfbf85+ca4b482;
  visual rides T5); #90 DONE (stickiness workaround removed, retail
  ordered-pick owns doorway hysteresis); #97 likely-closed note (the +5m
  pad producer deleted - verify at T5); #116 filed (slide-response
  family: tick-22760 lateral-slide loss + BSPStepUp D4 first-frame
  behavior, both pre-dating BR-7, oracle-first fix shape).
- Port plan: execution stamp updated to BR-2..BR-7 ALL CODE-COMPLETE
  with the per-commit map; BR-7 section marked code-complete; remaining
  = T5, the single comprehensive user visual gate.
- Memory digests (physics + render + MEMORY.md index) updated in the
  same session per the digest protocol.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-11 14:49:18 +02:00
Erik
85fe20f51d docs: stamp the port plan with end-of-day execution status (BR-2..6 code-complete, BR-7 + T5 remaining)
Doc-and-reality sync before the session handoff: the plan's phase
sections read future-tense while T1-T4 landed them. The render digest
carries the authoritative ledger; this stamp points there and names the
4 pre-existing #99-era Core failures as BR-7's built-in acceptance
signal.
2026-06-11 13:23:28 +02:00
Erik
1e5db94f0e docs: plan amendment - user directive: port everything, test once at the end
'I don't care if it is non-playable... I want everything ported, then we
test.' Per-phase playability + per-phase visual gates DROPPED. BR-2..BR-6
execute as ONE continuous port with build+tests green per commit and a
single comprehensive visual pass at the end (T5). Replaces the
playability rule with: every installment must be a COMPLETE retail
behavior, never half of one (the BR-2 punch-without-ordering lesson,
88be519).
2026-06-11 11:03:37 +02:00
Erik
695eca2c1f BR-1: RESOLVED as already-equivalent - premise falsified by pre-check, equivalence pinned, #113 attribution corrected
The plan's BR-1 ('implement the skipNoTexture draw-time surface gate')
died on its pre-check: acdream ALREADY suppresses every portal fill.
ReplicateProductionEmission_OnPortalFills replicates the exact emission
conditions of the production extractors on the hall/cottage fills:
pos=False neg=False for every one (Stippling.NoPos skips the positive
side at ObjectMeshManager.PrepareGfxObjMeshData:1046,
PrepareCellStructMeshData:1394, CellMesh.Build:44, GfxObjMesh.Build:71;
the fills have no negative surface). There is nothing to gate.

What ships instead: StipplingSurfaceEquivalenceTests - 2,607 polys across
13 building models + 13 environments, ZERO violations both directions:
NoPos <=> untextured-surface. Our build-time skip is proven equivalent to
retail's draw-time skipNoTexture rule (Ghidra 0x0059d4a4, default on
@0x00820e30) on this content. The pin fails loudly if future content
breaks the invariant - the cue to implement the draw-time gate then.

Corrections folded into the plan + comparison docs:
- The #113 phantom residual CANNOT be GfxObj fills (they never reach a
  vertex buffer). Plausible true sites are cell-side: flood-admitted
  cells drawn with the pass-all NoClipSlice when slot-less
  (RetailPViewRenderer.cs:71), and/or cell statics drawn unclipped +
  un-viewcone'd (object-lists-skip-portal-view-gate, confirmed).
  BR-2 opens with the probe that pins which.
- The e46d3d9 user-gate observations (filter removed phantom/doors) were
  confounded - the filter was a provable mesh no-op on shells AND doors.
- Ledger rows solid-surface-skip-missing + the acdream half of
  portal-polys-baked-unconditional re-marked REFUTED-for-fills; the
  retail mechanism descriptions and the un-consumed PortalIndex->
  CBldPortal pairing (BR-4) stand.

Suites: Core 1398 green (1392 baseline + 6 new facts) + the 4 pre-existing
#99-era failures + 1 skip. No production code.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-11 06:25:31 +02:00
Erik
eb689ae73f docs: add "out of scope / tracked follow-ups" section to the port plan ($4)
Names the boundary of what BR-1..BR-8 delivers, so the gaps are written
down rather than silently assumed (the very thing that breeds whack-a-mole):
FU-1 transparency/sorting (BR-9 candidate, area unmapped), FU-2 dungeon
visibility scaling #95 (plausibly helped by BR-4/BR-6 but NOT guaranteed -
re-measure after), FU-3 LOD/degrades, FU-4 picking, FU-5 the ~30 open
questions (in the comparison doc $6), FU-6 verification top-up before
BR-8b lighting. None blocks BR-1..BR-8; each becomes its own item.

The #95 dungeon-scaling follow-up was previously raised only verbally -
now tracked in the plan. Sections 4/5 renumbered to 5/6.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-11 06:15:03 +02:00
Erik
5e2f99d08e docs: Phase A comparison + Phase B port plan (holistic building-render investigation)
Deliverable 1: docs/research/2026-06-11-building-render-acdream-vs-retail-
comparison.md - the acdream-vs-retail architecture comparison synthesized
from two ultracode mapping fan-outs (11/12 areas, ~90 agents, every retail
claim Ghidra/pc-cited, every acdream claim file:line, 40/76 divergences
adversarially verified so far; raw per-area evidence committed under
docs/research/2026-06-11-holistic-map/).

Headline findings: (1) retail flattens GfxObjs/cells at load exactly like
us (ConstructMesh + RemoveNonPortalNodes) - the MDI pipeline survives;
(2) the phantom/door mechanism is the skipNoTexture draw-time surface gate
(dat-confirmed); (3) retail never geometrically clips world geometry -
aperture exactness is a DEPTH discipline (punch maxZ1 / seal maxZ2 / gated
clear + far-to-near whole-mesh draws) - reframes #114; (4) flood admission
is already faithful, the trigger/depth/multi-view/cone-culling layers are
missing; (5) #115 root cause verified (boom damping severed from the
published collided viewer); collision A6.P4 design verified with
corrections (signed other_portal_id >= 0 gate).

Deliverable 2: docs/plans/2026-06-11-building-render-port-plan.md - the
phased port plan (BR-1 surface gate, BR-2 depth punch/seal, BR-3 delete
the shell chop, BR-4 draw-driven floods, BR-5 viewconeCheck, BR-6 one
gate, BR-7 collision A6.P4, BR-8 camera/lighting/LOD) with per-phase
acceptance criteria, bug closures, keep-list, and a playable-after-every-
phase migration order. AWAITING USER APPROVAL - no implementation.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-11 05:54:12 +02:00