Erik fa0c053ebf docs(physics): #347 closed WITHOUT a code change — retail's glide alternates exactly as ours does; AD-70 retired as a wrong inference ... The round-2 cdb capture is decisive: during a live retail glide, edge_slide fired ~1.5 times per find_transitional_position — the arm/move alternation's exact signature (3 entries on the arming tick, 0 on the moving tick) — with cliff_slide in lockstep, step_down at 2.5x, step_up 0, and every stack sample on our identical call path. cliff_slide's bytes match our port and ACE's (compare constant at 0x794610 verified 0.0), and the user could not distinguish the two clients side by side. The "retail redirects within the tick" premise misread round-1's set_sliding_normal cadence (per-event, not per-tick, so its 1:1 ratio with edge never discriminated anything). The alternation-tolerant assertion in Issue345SteepSlopeGlideTests is therefore the CORRECT retail-shape pin from both sides; its comment now cites the capture instead of calling the shape a residual. The #269 note is honest the other way: the hope that a within-tick port would explain that feel residual is withdrawn with the premise. The temporary Scratch347 diagnostic is deleted. Capture evidence: 345-glide-stacks.cdb.log (repo root, untracked, cited from the contract's RESOLUTION section). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>		2026-08-07 14:05:53 +02:00
..
acdream-architecture.md	feat(physics): C4 route 4b-3 — remote teleport + cell-less through the canonical placement	2026-08-04 16:00:10 +02:00
code-structure.md	feat(physics): C4 route 4b-3 — remote teleport + cell-less through the canonical placement	2026-08-04 16:00:10 +02:00
retail-divergence-register.md	docs(physics): #347 closed WITHOUT a code change — retail's glide alternates exactly as ours does; AD-70 retired as a wrong inference	2026-08-07 14:05:53 +02:00
worldbuilder-inventory.md	fix(physics): validate retail cell containment roots	2026-07-31 14:48:26 +02:00