Ports retail's missile Position handling into the canonical Runtime
placement owner instead of the deleted ApplyAuthoritativePosition
short-circuit. The Create/residence-window halves of the projectile
pipeline (RuntimeProjectile binding, TryBind's adopted-body branch,
the collision/shadow registration) were already canonical from prior
slices; this closes the remaining gap — how an ACCEPTED Position for
an in-flight missile is classified, placed, and presented.
Byte-decode (Step 1 hard gate, before any code was written):
CPhysicsObj::MoveOrTeleport @0x00516330-0x00516438 disassembled from
the PDB-paired binary (Capstone, x86 32-bit thiscall). `ret 0x10`
establishes four stack args; [esp+0x7c] (arg5, the velocity pointer)
is never referenced in any of the three branches (teleport/near/far).
The retail reviewer independently reproduced this by searching the
whole function body for the `24 7c` mod/rm+disp8 encoding a
`[esp+0x7c]` read would require and found zero occurrences. This
retired a fabricated `?? Vector3.Zero` fallback in the deleted method
— retail's PositionPack::UnPack initializes an absent velocity to
zero and MoveOrTeleport never installs it; the projectile's Vector
channel (RuntimeProjectilePhysicsUpdater.ApplyAuthoritativeVector)
remains the sole velocity authority for a missile. D-P5 in the
contract; the Runtime seam commits no velocity from the Position
packet at all.
The unbound-missile fix: RuntimeEntityObjectLifetime's
ClassifyRemoteAcceptedPosition now derives ProjectileAuthoritative
from a CONJUNCTIVE predicate — the Missile bit AND a bound
RuntimeProjectile whose Body is the canonical PhysicsBody — never the
bit alone. Retail places every non-player CPhysicsObj unconditionally
(there is no missile-specific placement gate in MoveOrTeleport or its
callers), so an unbindable or not-yet-bound missile taking the
ordinary remote tail is retail-faithful, not a fallback: the earlier
bit-only discriminator would have silently frozen it instead.
AP-141 records this as a deliberate, recorded divergence, not
fidelity. Retail mechanically WOULD arm a missile's ConstrainTo leash
on any nonzero MoveOrTeleport return: HandleReceivedPosition
@0x00453FD0's only kind test is player-vs-not, ConstrainTo
@0x00454272 has no kind test of its own, and CPhysicsObj::ConstrainTo
@0x00510520 creates a PositionManager on demand via
MakePositionManager @0x00510523 if one doesn't exist. acdream
deliberately does not construct that EntityPhysicsHost/
PositionManager/InterpolationManager chain for a ballistic body — the
route-5b split the C4 route 5 contract rejected — so a live missile
never shows an armed leash and never catches up via the near/
UnroutedCatchUp policy. This divergence is safe specifically because
ACE never sends UpdatePosition for a missile
(references/ACE/Source/ACE.Server/WorldObjects/WorldObject_Tick.cs:
333-334, SendUpdatePosition() commented out inside the
PhysicsState.Missile branch at :265) — every half of this row is
deterministic-test-gated only, never exercised against a real server.
AP-141 also records the surviving ConstrainTo re-anchor divergence
under clause (b): for the adopted-body case (TryBind's shared-body
branch — an ordinary remote whose Missile bit is set by a later
State packet, so it still carries a live RemoteMotion), acdream now
ports retail's teleport-branch and far-branch StopInterpolating
action (Interp.Clear()), but never re-arms or re-anchors the
inherited ConstrainTo leash the way retail's HandleReceivedPosition
@0x00454254/@0x00454272 does on every nonzero return. The risk
column's earlier wording — that a stale leash "would drag the body
toward a stale anchor" — was wrong and is retracted in this same
commit: ConstraintManager.ConstraintPos is write-only in both retail
and the port (never read by AdjustOffset), and
ConstraintManager::adjust_offset @0x00556180 only tapers or zeroes an
already-composed per-tick offset while InContact — a leash brakes
motion the interp/sticky chain already produced, it cannot pull
anything toward the anchor. The real residual is one tick of un-reset
brake accumulator, contact-gated, and it cannot move an airborne
far-snapped missile at all (the clamp branch does not run while
airborne).
NO CONNECTED GATE EXISTS for this route, by design: ACE never sends a
missile UpdatePosition (see above), so retail's own server never
exercises this code path in play. Every proof obligation here is
test-gated only — Runtime and App-level fixtures constructing the
packet directly — never a live client/server capture.
Three review rounds closed 8 MAJOR findings before this landed:
round 1 (A1 App discarded the seam's status; A2/R1 silent swallow on
an unbound missile; A3/R2 the adopted-body teleport_hook never
wired; A4/A5 zero Runtime/App test coverage); round 2 (a
ParentCellId regression introduced by round 1's own R6 finding,
which the retail reviewer retracted the following round as factually
wrong — the fix here is the REVERT to record.FullCellId, not the
relocation round 1 shipped; B2 the far-branch StopInterpolating skip
never extended to the adopted-body case; residual App/Runtime store-
path coverage; a per-packet closure contradicting the file's own
#315 cached-delegate pattern). Round 3 closed on coverage alone (no
defect): the Advance() retry arm's projectile branch — added at
round 2, semantically reordered at round 2's B5 fix (skip prediction
invalidation on a re-parked Contention, since it writes nothing) —
had never been executed by any test; two new tests drive it directly
and are sabotage-verified against both the reordering and the
retry-arm's own SyncProjectilePresentation call site. The one
recorded defect this campaign produced (the ParentCellId regression)
was caused by complying with a review finding that its own author
later retracted — the standing lesson recorded for future rounds is
that review findings are evidence to re-verify against the code, not
commands to obey unconditionally.
Complete Release suite: 11,063 passed / 4 skipped / 0 failed
(baseline 11,036 at
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| architecture | ||
| audit | ||
| plans | ||
| reference | ||
| reports | ||
| research | ||
| superpowers | ||
| bugs.md | ||
| ISSUES.md | ||
| README.md | ||
acdream documentation map
This page is the entry point for project documentation. It distinguishes current sources of truth from implementation history so an old plan or issue banner cannot silently override the current program state.
Current snapshot — 2026-07-27
- Milestone state: M3, “Cast a spell,” landed 2026-07-21. M4, “Live in the world,” is active.
- M4 gameplay program: resume the pre-M4 world-interaction completion program. Favorite-spell overflow, status Use/Assess, and the complete assessment surface are user-accepted. Equipped-child picking and vendor browse/transactions remain Slices 4–6.
- Structural/runtime state: all eight
GameWindowdecomposition slices, Modern Runtime Slices A–J, and the connected visual/lifecycle gates are complete.GameWindowis a 1,622-line composition/callback shell.AcDream.Runtime.GameRuntimeowns canonical session, entity/object, gameplay, movement, physics, projectile, environment, and portal state; graphical and no-window hosts borrow the same owner graph. - Headless state: Slice K is complete.
AcDream.Headlessis a presentation-free Windows/Linux host with deterministic commands/events, shared immutable content, multi-session isolation, reconnect, resource telemetry, and 1/5/10/30-session gates. The final two-account native-Linux soak completed ten minutes, logged out through ACE, and converged every ownership ledger. - Linux graphical state: Slice L0 and the L1 implementation checkpoint are
complete at
66f114b2and11501d52. Native Windows passes the active modern-GL/audio/window smoke. WSLg X11/Wayland correctly reject their missingGL_ARB_bindless_texture. Physical-Linux validation and L2–L6 are explicitly deferred; resume at the supported AMD/NVIDIA L1 gate. - Completed gameplay gates: R6 locomotion/collision/projectile/teleport/ radar, two-client portal-out/materialization, indoor prepared collision, loot ordering, local/remote ground drops, and selection-marker lifetime.
- Separate visual verification: issue
#225, the shared-alpha lifestone/particle result; its connected resource-lifetime and performance routes pass. - Carried behaviour debt: issue
#153(far teleport onto an unstreamed edge),#116(narrowed slide response),#235(capped/RDP jump cadence), and the active temporary-stopgap rows in the divergence register. - Divergence audit: 189 active rows — IA 18, AD 38, AP 91, TS 38, and UN 4 — plus retained struck/retired historical rows such as TS-37.
- Latest automated baseline: the Release build succeeds with the 17
test-project warnings tracked by issue
#228; 8,826 tests pass and five are intentionally skipped. App passes 3,763 / 3 skips. The L1 Windows supported smoke and WSLg X11/Wayland negative-capability reports all end with zero window/GL/input/audio ownership.
Sources of truth
Read these in this order when deciding what to do next:
plans/2026-05-12-milestones.md— the active playable outcome, freeze boundaries, and visual gates.plans/2026-04-11-roadmap.md— strategic phase ledger: shipped, active, deferred, and future work.ISSUES.md— tactical defects and small follow-ups. The status inside an issue is authoritative; physical order is not.architecture/retail-divergence-register.md— every known place runtime behavior can differ from retail.architecture/acdream-architecture.mdandarchitecture/code-structure.md— ownership, dependency, update-thread, and extraction rules.architecture/worldbuilder-inventory.md— rendering/DAT code already owned in-tree versus mechanisms still ours to port.
If these disagree, milestones control the current outcome, the roadmap controls work ordering, the issue status controls the individual defect, and the architecture documents control implementation shape. Reconcile the stale document in the same change; do not leave both claims standing.
Research and implementation records
research/named-retail/is the primary retail oracle: named pseudo-C, headers, symbols, and types from the Sept 2013 build.research/decompiled/is the older Ghidra fallback.research/contains focused pseudocode, traces, fixtures, and gate reports. A dated research note records evidence; it does not become a new roadmap.superpowers/specs/andsuperpowers/plans/are per-slice design and execution records. Completed plans remain historical.audit/contains completion and conformance audits.reference/ace-commands.mdpreserves the local ACE server's complete in-game command catalog and points to the authoritative per-command help surface.
Durable memory
../claude-memory/MEMORY.mdindexes the live subsystem memories and the render/physics digests. Read a domain digest before changing that subsystem, especially its DO-NOT-RETRY table.../memory/contains stable engineering references such as the modern rendering pipeline, two-tier streaming, and toolchain notes.
Memory accelerates recall; it does not outrank the canonical documents above. When current truth changes, update the relevant canonical document and distill only the durable lesson into memory.
Historical and deprecated documents
bugs.mdis the April 2026 bug snapshot. It is preserved for archaeology and is not an active ledger.- Dated plans and specs describe the decision at that time. Their completion wording is historical unless the current milestone/roadmap explicitly links the item as active.
- Old
R1→R8architecture sequencing is superseded. Current execution comes from the milestones and strategic roadmap.
Documentation maintenance rules
- Update milestone, roadmap, issue, divergence, architecture, and memory claims in the same commit when a shipped change affects them.
- Keep one issue ID per defect. Narrow an issue in place; do not reuse another issue's number as a shorthand.
- Mark automated, connected, and visual gates separately. An automated pass is not a visual acceptance, and an RDP throughput sample is not a local-display visual comparison.
- Preserve research history, but remove stale “current/next” claims from living documents once the state advances.