docs/ISSUES.md: #265 and #166 updated with the root cause and fix from
the prior two commits; closure of both pends the user's visual-gate
acceptance. #265 also records the confirmed-separate uphill-bounce
finding (AD-25, byte-exact retail, out of scope). #166 records that the
Campaign P visual-matrix recheck it was waiting on DID happen and found
the glide/bounce still missing even with AD-25/AP-7/AD-55/TS-4 all
landed - that negative result is what triggered the #265 capture bisect
and this fix.
docs/architecture/retail-divergence-register.md: AP-7's retirement note
corrected. The row's original claim ("no horizontal velocity to hammer")
undersold the gap - calc_friction was structurally unreachable with
meaningful data on any grounded path, not just inert on the root-motion
path. No new row filed: this change ports retail's mechanism faithfully
and does not introduce a new deviation.
docs/research/2026-07-30-265-capture-bisect.md: full "as-fixed" addendum
(new section 9) recording the implementation - the fix mechanism, fixture
results (freeze reproduced under the old model, slide+decay proven under
the new one), the downhill-direction derivation for the synthetic decay
case, the two separate mechanisms found while building the Runtime tests
(LeaveGround's edge-timing recompute, AP-77's no-sink fallback), the
uphill-bounce orthogonality proof, and final test totals.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
7fcc7db1d1