acdream/tests/AcDream.App.Tests/Net/RetailSkillFormulaTests.cs
Erik 356545c530 fix(chargen): Campaign CC CC5 re-review residuals R1-R5 + nits — REVIEW-CLOSED
The narrow re-review of fix commits 0c8e1e7d+2d4168f9 found every code fix
oracle-verified but returned NOT CLOSED on five test/doc residuals plus
three nits and a follow-up filing. All fixed:

- R1: the claimed "external-change->user-commit->SetName" regression test
  for F1 (the deleted _suppressNextFieldEvent latch) never existed — the
  Runtime-layer randomize test doesn't touch the page. Added
  CharacterCreationUiControllerTests.SummaryNameField_RealCommitAfter
  ExternalRefreshWhileUnfocused_StillReachesSetName: drives Refresh with a
  revision bump + changed snapshot.Name while the field is unfocused (the
  programmatic SetText path that used to arm the latch), THEN performs a
  real user commit (field.SetText + field.Submit(), the actual event path),
  asserting SetName receives the player's typed text.
- R2: RetailSkillFormula.CalculateChargenScore and ChargenSkillScoreResolver
  had zero direct coverage (the F12(d) test substitutes skillId*10). Added
  a Untrained/Trained(+5)/Specialized(+10) theory, the divisor-zero skip
  path, and a six-way AttributeId theory (Str=1..Self=6) to
  RetailSkillFormulaTests.cs.
- R3: RetailSkillFormula.cs's doc comment claimed "no retail-authored skill
  sets MinLevel above Untrained=1" without ever reading the field — ACE's
  own SkillBase.cs hedges the same field "// 1-2?". MEASURED (not assumed)
  against the installed EoR dat's global SkillTable
  (CharacterCreationLiveDatTests.SkillTable_MinLevelDistribution_
  NeverExceedsTrained): 23 skills at MinLevel 1, 15 at MinLevel 2, zero
  above 2, of 38 priced skills. ACE's hedge was right; the doc comment now
  states the measured fact and leans on the structural argument (the gate
  holds for Trained/Specialized under any MinLevel in {1,2}) as load-
  bearing, not the unverified data claim.
- R4: filed AP-228 — the Summary/Skills skill-row KEY sources from
  ItemAppraisalTextFormatter.SkillName's hardcoded English switch, where
  retail's own key is DAT-sourced (SkillBase->_name via %hs,
  0x0047b90f-0x0047b915) — same divergence class as AP-226 filed the same
  round, reversed polarity, also present at CC4's Skills page. Softened
  AP-224's "ported exactly, not simplified" claim: it only ever covered the
  row's VALUE/template, never its KEY.
- R5: this commit corrects 0c8e1e7d's gate claim. "Release build zero
  warnings" was false: a clean `dotnet build -c Release -t:Rebuild` shows
  25 pre-existing warnings (18 in tests/AcDream.Core.Tests, 7 in
  tests/AcDream.App.Tests — Composition/HostInputCameraCompositionTests.cs,
  Composition/WorldRenderCompositionTests.cs,
  UI/Layout/OptionsPanelLiveMountProbeTests.cs), none in any file this
  campaign or its residual round touched. History is not amended; this is
  the correction.

Nits: the ChargenPreviewController ctor doc now also cites
gmCGSummaryPage::Update @0x0047baa0 (the per-heritage re-derive site — 0xc
Olthoi/0xd OlthoiAcid/else — not just the one-shot InitializePage seed) as
the stronger justification for why Rebuild re-derives the zoomed-out eye
per heritage on every change. RuntimeCharacterCreationState's F2 comment
("Finish becoming a permanent no-op") reworded: the same unconditional
_verificationPending = false assignment ran pre-fix too, so Finish was
never blocked — only the response FEEDBACK vanished (no dialog, no created
character, nothing), not the request itself. Filed #404 for
ChargenSkillScoreResolver's own independent SkillTable read alongside
ChargenTableReader's (cleanup follow-up, out of this round's scope).

Ledger: CC5 flipped REVIEW-CLOSED in the campaign plan (dual-lens
architectural PASS-with-items / retail-fidelity FAIL -> F1-F14 fix round
0c8e1e7d -> narrow re-review: all code oracle-verified, residuals R1-R5
test/doc -> this commit; re-reviewer pre-authorized lead diff-check close).
This commit's own sha is recorded by a follow-up ledger-only commit,
matching 2d4168f9's own pattern.

Gates: Release build 0 errors (25 pre-existing warnings, unrelated to this
round — see R5 above); App suite 5257/3 skips (was 5242/3), 0 failed;
Runtime suite 1726/0 (unchanged); the three new/measured tests (R1, R2's
ten cases, R3) all pass individually.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-16 01:57:07 +02:00

213 lines
7.9 KiB
C#

using AcDream.App.Net;
using AcDream.Core.CharGen;
using DatReaderWriter.DBObjs;
using DatReaderWriter.Enums;
using DatReaderWriter.Types;
namespace AcDream.App.Tests.Net;
public sealed class RetailSkillFormulaTests
{
[Fact]
public void ZeroDivisorIsTheOnlyFormulaFailureGate()
{
SkillFormula invalid = Formula(w: 7, x: 1, y: 1, z: 0);
Assert.False(RetailSkillFormula.TryCalculate(invalid, 10u, 20u, out uint invalidResult));
Assert.Equal(0u, invalidResult);
SkillFormula zeroX = Formula(w: 7, x: 0, y: 2, z: 3);
Assert.True(RetailSkillFormula.TryCalculate(zeroX, 10u, 4u, out uint validResult));
Assert.Equal(5u, validResult);
}
[Theory]
[InlineData(9u, 4u, 2u)]
[InlineData(10u, 4u, 3u)]
[InlineData(11u, 4u, 3u)]
[InlineData(12u, 4u, 3u)]
public void DivisionRoundsToNearestWithExactHalvesUp(
uint numerator,
uint divisor,
uint expected)
{
SkillFormula formula = Formula(w: 0, x: 1, y: 0, z: divisor);
Assert.True(RetailSkillFormula.TryCalculate(
formula,
numerator,
0u,
out uint result));
Assert.Equal(expected, result);
}
[Fact]
public void AdditiveWordIsInsideTheNumerator()
{
SkillFormula formula = Formula(w: 3, x: 1, y: 1, z: 4);
Assert.True(RetailSkillFormula.TryCalculate(formula, 4u, 2u, out uint result));
Assert.Equal(2u, result);
}
[Fact]
public void NumeratorUsesUnsignedThirtyTwoBitWrap()
{
SkillFormula formula = Formula(w: 1, x: 2, y: 0, z: 2);
Assert.True(RetailSkillFormula.TryCalculate(
formula,
uint.MaxValue,
0u,
out uint result));
Assert.Equal(0x80000000u, result);
}
[Fact]
public void SignedDatStorageIsReinterpretedAsRetailUnsignedWords()
{
SkillFormula formula = Formula(w: -1, x: 0, y: 0, z: 1);
Assert.True(RetailSkillFormula.TryCalculate(formula, 0u, 0u, out uint result));
Assert.Equal(uint.MaxValue, result);
}
[Fact]
public void LiveResolverLooksUpTheDatFormulaAndTreatsMissingAttributesAsZero()
{
const uint skillId = 0x345u;
const uint firstAttributeId = 1u;
const uint secondAttributeId = 2u;
var skillTable = new SkillTable();
skillTable.Skills.Add((SkillId)skillId, new SkillBase
{
Formula = new SkillFormula
{
AdditiveBonus = 1,
Attribute1Multiplier = 1,
Attribute2Multiplier = 2,
Divisor = 3,
Attribute1 = (AttributeId)firstAttributeId,
Attribute2 = (AttributeId)secondAttributeId,
},
});
var resolver = new LiveSkillCreditResolver(skillTable);
uint result = resolver.Resolve(
skillId,
new Dictionary<uint, uint> { [firstAttributeId] = 8u });
Assert.Equal(3u, result);
Assert.Equal(0u, resolver.Resolve(0x999u, new Dictionary<uint, uint>()));
}
private static SkillFormula Formula(int w, int x, int y, uint z) => new()
{
AdditiveBonus = w,
Attribute1Multiplier = x,
Attribute2Multiplier = y,
Divisor = unchecked((int)z),
};
// ── CC5 re-review residual round, R2 (2026-08-16): RetailSkillFormula.
// ── CalculateChargenScore / ChargenSkillScoreResolver had zero direct
// ── coverage — the F12(d) test substitutes `skillId * 10` instead of
// ── exercising the real formula. ─────────────────────────────────────
/// <summary>
/// <see cref="RetailSkillFormula.CalculateChargenScore"/>'s level bonus:
/// Untrained adds nothing, Trained adds 5, Specialized adds 10, on top
/// of the SAME base <see cref="RetailSkillFormula.TryCalculate"/> result
/// (formula here: <c>w=0, x=1, y=0, z=1</c> against
/// <c>attribute1=5</c> -&gt; base 5).
/// </summary>
[Theory]
[InlineData(ChargenSkillAdvancementClass.Untrained, 5u)]
[InlineData(ChargenSkillAdvancementClass.Trained, 10u)]
[InlineData(ChargenSkillAdvancementClass.Specialized, 15u)]
public void CalculateChargenScore_AddsTheLevelBonusOnTopOfTheBaseFormula(
ChargenSkillAdvancementClass level,
uint expected)
{
var skillBase = new SkillBase { Formula = Formula(w: 0, x: 1, y: 0, z: 1) };
uint result = RetailSkillFormula.CalculateChargenScore(skillBase, attribute1: 5u, attribute2: 0u, level);
Assert.Equal(expected, result);
}
/// <summary>
/// The divisor-zero skip path: <see cref="RetailSkillFormula.TryCalculate"/>'s
/// own failure gate short-circuits <see cref="RetailSkillFormula.CalculateChargenScore"/>
/// to a flat 0 BEFORE the level bonus is ever added — even for
/// Specialized, which would otherwise add 10.
/// </summary>
[Fact]
public void CalculateChargenScore_ZeroDivisor_ReturnsZero_RegardlessOfLevel()
{
var skillBase = new SkillBase { Formula = Formula(w: 7, x: 1, y: 1, z: 0) };
Assert.Equal(0u, RetailSkillFormula.CalculateChargenScore(
skillBase, 10u, 20u, ChargenSkillAdvancementClass.Untrained));
Assert.Equal(0u, RetailSkillFormula.CalculateChargenScore(
skillBase, 10u, 20u, ChargenSkillAdvancementClass.Trained));
Assert.Equal(0u, RetailSkillFormula.CalculateChargenScore(
skillBase, 10u, 20u, ChargenSkillAdvancementClass.Specialized));
}
/// <summary>
/// <see cref="ChargenSkillScoreResolver.Resolve"/>'s six-way
/// <c>ResolveAttribute</c> switch — one case per
/// <see cref="AttributeId"/> (Strength=1..Self=6) — resolving through a
/// formula that reads ONLY <c>Attribute1</c> (<c>x=1, y=0</c>) so the
/// result unambiguously reports which of the six
/// <see cref="ChargenAttributeValues"/> fields the switch actually read.
/// </summary>
[Theory]
[InlineData(AttributeId.Strength)]
[InlineData(AttributeId.Endurance)]
[InlineData(AttributeId.Coordination)]
[InlineData(AttributeId.Quickness)]
[InlineData(AttributeId.Focus)]
[InlineData(AttributeId.Self)]
public void ChargenSkillScoreResolver_ResolvesEachAttributeIdThroughTheSixWaySwitch(
AttributeId attributeId)
{
const uint skillId = 0x10u;
var skillTable = new SkillTable();
skillTable.Skills.Add((SkillId)skillId, new SkillBase
{
Formula = new SkillFormula
{
AdditiveBonus = 0,
Attribute1Multiplier = 1,
Attribute2Multiplier = 0,
Divisor = 1,
Attribute1 = attributeId,
// Attribute2 deliberately left at its zero default (Strength) —
// Attribute2Multiplier=0 means whatever it reads contributes
// nothing, so it cannot mask a wrong Attribute1 case.
},
});
var resolver = new ChargenSkillScoreResolver(skillTable);
ChargenAttributeValues attributes = AttributeValuesWith(attributeId, 42);
uint result = resolver.Resolve(skillId, attributes, ChargenSkillAdvancementClass.Untrained);
Assert.Equal(42u, result);
}
private static ChargenAttributeValues AttributeValuesWith(AttributeId attributeId, int value) =>
attributeId switch
{
AttributeId.Strength => new ChargenAttributeValues(value, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0),
AttributeId.Endurance => new ChargenAttributeValues(0, value, 0, 0, 0, 0),
AttributeId.Coordination => new ChargenAttributeValues(0, 0, value, 0, 0, 0),
AttributeId.Quickness => new ChargenAttributeValues(0, 0, 0, value, 0, 0),
AttributeId.Focus => new ChargenAttributeValues(0, 0, 0, 0, value, 0),
AttributeId.Self => new ChargenAttributeValues(0, 0, 0, 0, 0, value),
_ => default,
};
}