erik/acdream
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 2
acdream/docs
History
Erik 1d73ce524c test(app): measure the warmed path, not the path being warmed (#250) 
The zero-allocation family failed about one full-suite run in three, on
unchanged trees, and had been dismissed as inherent noise in
`GC.GetAllocatedBytesForCurrentThread` three separate times. It is not noise.
Reading the four members side by side, they share one root: **the measured
window was never the warmed path.**

  UiDatFontTests            1 warm call, then a 10,000-iteration loop inline
  RenderFrameProductTests   8 warm calls, then a 1,000-iteration loop inline
  OracleTests               1 warm call, 1 measured call
  ArchRenderSceneTests      warms Apply(registrations), measures Apply(updates)

Two mechanisms come out of that table. A test method is JIT-compiled at tier 0
like anything else, and a long-running loop in tier-0 code gets replaced
mid-flight by on-stack replacement — which compiles on the thread running the
loop, so its bookkeeping is charged to the window being measured. That is the
first two. And `ArchRenderSceneTests` warmed one arm of a switch and measured
the other, so the measured call was the first ever into `ApplyUpdate` and paid
that arm's JIT, type loads and static initialisation inside the window;
`RenderFrameProductTests` warmed 8 times, below the tier-0 call-counting
threshold of 30, so promotion was still pending when measurement began.

That also explains the signature nobody could account for. Alone, the process is
quiet and the runtime has finished before the assertion arrives. Alongside eight
other test assemblies, tier-0 compilation never stops, the call-counting delay is
re-armed continually, and the work slides into the window. Clean in isolation,
failing under load, on a tree that changed nothing.

`ZeroAllocationProbe` invokes the step many times before measuring anything, then
measures windows that run the same already-warmed loop over the same
already-taken path. Each window is a batch of 32 invocations and it reports the
minimum across 4 of them. Both halves are load-bearing: the minimum is what
excludes a one-time cost, and the batch is what keeps the assertion as strong as
the loops it replaces — minimising over *single* invocations would report zero
for a path that allocates every tenth call, which is a real regression made
invisible. I had written it that way first and the apparatus test caught it.

**The bound is untouched: exactly zero, no tolerance, no retry, no assertion
relaxed.** `ZeroAllocationProbeTests` proves the apparatus can still fail — a
step allocating every call reads above zero and does throw, a first-invocation
cost reads as zero, a cost every tenth call is caught, and the one stated limit
(the batch must cover the period) is pinned as a test rather than left as prose.
Without those, a later edit could quietly make the whole family unfailable.

Twelve further sites in this assembly still use the hand-rolled shape. None has
been observed failing, and each needs its own repeatability analysis — several
mutate state or consume monotonic sequences — so they are listed in the issue
for adoption when next touched rather than converted blind at scale.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-29 03:42:08 +02:00
..
architecture docs(render): V11 closeout — register, architecture, code structure, issues 2026-07-29 03:20:04 +02:00
audit docs: update audit — Sprint 1 items verified (sequence counters + scenery LCG) 2026-04-13 13:51:39 +02:00
plans merge(core): the enum verification campaign, onto the post-deletion tree 2026-07-29 03:30:11 +02:00
reference docs(reference): preserve local ACE command catalog 2026-07-27 00:03:58 +02:00
reports docs: publish the Campaign V report 2026-07-28 20:51:13 +02:00
research merge(net): the wire-stack audit, and one reconciled #255 2026-07-29 03:31:25 +02:00
superpowers fix(world): remove non-retail portal exit fade 2026-07-15 23:20:52 +02:00
bugs.md docs: reconcile project status and navigation 2026-07-20 13:00:41 +02:00
ISSUES.md test(app): measure the warmed path, not the path being warmed (#250) 2026-07-29 03:42:08 +02:00
README.md docs: reconcile project state and refresh README 2026-07-27 12:53:31 +02:00

README.md

acdream documentation map

This page is the entry point for project documentation. It distinguishes current sources of truth from implementation history so an old plan or issue banner cannot silently override the current program state.

Current snapshot — 2026-07-27

  • Milestone state: M3, “Cast a spell,” landed 2026-07-21. M4, “Live in the world,” is active.
  • M4 gameplay program: resume the pre-M4 world-interaction completion program. Favorite-spell overflow, status Use/Assess, and the complete assessment surface are user-accepted. Equipped-child picking and vendor browse/transactions remain Slices 4–6.
  • Structural/runtime state: all eight GameWindow decomposition slices, Modern Runtime Slices A–J, and the connected visual/lifecycle gates are complete. GameWindow is a 1,622-line composition/callback shell. AcDream.Runtime.GameRuntime owns canonical session, entity/object, gameplay, movement, physics, projectile, environment, and portal state; graphical and no-window hosts borrow the same owner graph.
  • Headless state: Slice K is complete. AcDream.Headless is a presentation-free Windows/Linux host with deterministic commands/events, shared immutable content, multi-session isolation, reconnect, resource telemetry, and 1/5/10/30-session gates. The final two-account native-Linux soak completed ten minutes, logged out through ACE, and converged every ownership ledger.
  • Linux graphical state: Slice L0 and the L1 implementation checkpoint are complete at 66f114b2 and 11501d52. Native Windows passes the active modern-GL/audio/window smoke. WSLg X11/Wayland correctly reject their missing GL_ARB_bindless_texture. Physical-Linux validation and L2–L6 are explicitly deferred; resume at the supported AMD/NVIDIA L1 gate.
  • Completed gameplay gates: R6 locomotion/collision/projectile/teleport/ radar, two-client portal-out/materialization, indoor prepared collision, loot ordering, local/remote ground drops, and selection-marker lifetime.
  • Separate visual verification: issue #225, the shared-alpha lifestone/particle result; its connected resource-lifetime and performance routes pass.
  • Carried behaviour debt: issue #153 (far teleport onto an unstreamed edge), #116 (narrowed slide response), #235 (capped/RDP jump cadence), and the active temporary-stopgap rows in the divergence register.
  • Divergence audit: 189 active rows — IA 18, AD 38, AP 91, TS 38, and UN 4 — plus retained struck/retired historical rows such as TS-37.
  • Latest automated baseline: the Release build succeeds with the 17 test-project warnings tracked by issue #228; 8,826 tests pass and five are intentionally skipped. App passes 3,763 / 3 skips. The L1 Windows supported smoke and WSLg X11/Wayland negative-capability reports all end with zero window/GL/input/audio ownership.

Sources of truth

Read these in this order when deciding what to do next:

  1. plans/2026-05-12-milestones.md — the active playable outcome, freeze boundaries, and visual gates.
  2. plans/2026-04-11-roadmap.md — strategic phase ledger: shipped, active, deferred, and future work.
  3. ISSUES.md — tactical defects and small follow-ups. The status inside an issue is authoritative; physical order is not.
  4. architecture/retail-divergence-register.md — every known place runtime behavior can differ from retail.
  5. architecture/acdream-architecture.md and architecture/code-structure.md — ownership, dependency, update-thread, and extraction rules.
  6. architecture/worldbuilder-inventory.md — rendering/DAT code already owned in-tree versus mechanisms still ours to port.

If these disagree, milestones control the current outcome, the roadmap controls work ordering, the issue status controls the individual defect, and the architecture documents control implementation shape. Reconcile the stale document in the same change; do not leave both claims standing.

Research and implementation records

  • research/named-retail/ is the primary retail oracle: named pseudo-C, headers, symbols, and types from the Sept 2013 build.
  • research/decompiled/ is the older Ghidra fallback.
  • research/ contains focused pseudocode, traces, fixtures, and gate reports. A dated research note records evidence; it does not become a new roadmap.
  • superpowers/specs/ and superpowers/plans/ are per-slice design and execution records. Completed plans remain historical.
  • audit/ contains completion and conformance audits.
  • reference/ace-commands.md preserves the local ACE server's complete in-game command catalog and points to the authoritative per-command help surface.

Durable memory

  • ../claude-memory/MEMORY.md indexes the live subsystem memories and the render/physics digests. Read a domain digest before changing that subsystem, especially its DO-NOT-RETRY table.
  • ../memory/ contains stable engineering references such as the modern rendering pipeline, two-tier streaming, and toolchain notes.

Memory accelerates recall; it does not outrank the canonical documents above. When current truth changes, update the relevant canonical document and distill only the durable lesson into memory.

Historical and deprecated documents

  • bugs.md is the April 2026 bug snapshot. It is preserved for archaeology and is not an active ledger.
  • Dated plans and specs describe the decision at that time. Their completion wording is historical unless the current milestone/roadmap explicitly links the item as active.
  • Old R1→R8 architecture sequencing is superseded. Current execution comes from the milestones and strategic roadmap.

Documentation maintenance rules

  • Update milestone, roadmap, issue, divergence, architecture, and memory claims in the same commit when a shipped change affects them.
  • Keep one issue ID per defect. Narrow an issue in place; do not reuse another issue's number as a shorthand.
  • Mark automated, connected, and visual gates separately. An automated pass is not a visual acceptance, and an RDP throughput sample is not a local-display visual comparison.
  • Preserve research history, but remove stale “current/next” claims from living documents once the state advances.