acdream/docs/research/2026-05-06-locomotion-cycle-transitions
Erik 5660f3483d docs(motion): #39 — candidate fix ineffective; refute Shift-toggle wire hypothesis
Visual-verify of commit 8fa04af in launch-39-candidate.log refutes the
static-analysis hypothesis that retail does not broadcast UMs on
HoldKey-only changes. The log shows:

- [FWD_WIRE] for retail actor 0x50000001 contains many direct Walk↔Run
  transitions (0x44000007 ↔ 0x45000005). ACE IS sending UMs on Shift
  toggle.
- [SETCYCLE] fires correctly per UM; Sequencer.CurrentMotion cycles
  through Walk / Run / Turn / Sidestep correctly per [UM_RAW].
- [UPCYCLE_PLAYER] never fired — UM grace correctly suppressed it
  (UMs at >2 Hz, well within 500 ms grace).
- User reports legs visually stuck in walking animation despite the
  wire/sequencer saying Run.

Conclusion: bug is downstream of Sequencer.CurrentMotion — same as
2026-05-03 hypothesis F. Most likely _currNode lands on the walk-to-run
transition link after SetCycle (`currNodeIsCyclic=False` confirmed in
[SCFULL]) and Advance does not progress past it to the cycle.

The candidate fix code (LastUMTime, ApplyPlayerLocomotionRefinement,
hysteresis constants, un-gated call site) is left in place — harmless
because UM grace blocks the velocity-fallback path while UMs arrive,
and the infrastructure may be useful for cases #2–#7 if those need
velocity fallback. But it does not close case #1.

Updates ISSUES.md #39 with refuted hypothesis + new evidence + next
step pointer. findings-static.md gains "Visual-verify result" §
documenting the diagnostic dump and recommending the next investigation
target be AnimationSequencer.Advance queue-handling.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-06 07:21:42 +02:00
..
findings-static.md docs(motion): #39 — candidate fix ineffective; refute Shift-toggle wire hypothesis 2026-05-06 07:21:42 +02:00
investigation-prompt.md fix(motion): #39 candidate — un-gate UP velocity-cycle for player remotes (forward only) 2026-05-06 06:34:20 +02:00