research(phys): A6.P3 #98 — [step-walk-adjust] capture + findings
The diagnostic-first capture revealed the failure mode the plan's four-branch decision tree (A/B/C/D) did not anticipate. AdjustOffset is CORRECT: 145/146 calls use the into-plane branch, mean zGain +0.045 m per call, sphere world Z climbs 90.95 -> 92.80 monotonically. The climb caps at world Z 92.80 (cottage floor at 94.00 is still 1.20 m above). At the cap, the per-step CP reset at TransitionTypes.cs 723-725 clears ContactPlaneValid as designed; TransitionalInsert should re-establish CP at the proposed position. Step-up logic fires because the offset has +Z; step-up calls DoStepDown(stepDownHeight= 0.6, runPlacement=true). The downward probe finds NO walkable surface within 0.6 m below the proposed position (cottage floor is ABOVE, not below) -- 101 stepdown-reject hits in this capture vs 1 acceptance. Conclusion: Target E (new). Three candidate fix shapes named in the findings note. Each one researched against retail named-decomp before any code lands. Test baseline 1167 + 8 maintained. Findings: docs/research/2026-05-23-a6-stepwalkadjust-findings.md Capture: docs/research/2026-05-23-a6-captures/stepwalkadjust/acdream.log Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
8a232a3e6e
commit
8daf7e7e4d
2 changed files with 6652 additions and 0 deletions
6467
docs/research/2026-05-23-a6-captures/stepwalkadjust/acdream.log
Normal file
6467
docs/research/2026-05-23-a6-captures/stepwalkadjust/acdream.log
Normal file
File diff suppressed because it is too large
Load diff
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue