docs: close the recent-regression cleanup plan

S1 (#284), S2 (#282), and S3 (#283) are all landed and user-accepted. S3 is
recorded as measured-unreachable rather than restructured, so the plan's
"prove or disprove before moving ownership" step is what actually decided the
outcome.

Final complete Release solution: 10,844 passed / 4 skipped / 0 failed.
Next: the original campaign order, starting at C4 route 2.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Erik 2026-08-03 14:34:07 +02:00
parent 89cf1e66d0
commit 2ef02f8cbb

View file

@ -7,6 +7,28 @@ six more placement routes are not stacked on top of them.
Issues: #282 (two cell fields), #283 (two world origins), #284 (silent park). Issues: #282 (two cell fields), #283 (two world origins), #284 (silent park).
## Status — CLOSED 2026-08-03
All three landed and are user-accepted.
| Slice | Issue | Commit | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | #284 | `97d11e6c` | Park reasons named; terminal on the contradictory state |
| S2 | #282 | `3c36b4cc` | One cell owner (`VisibilityCellId`); register row AP-133 |
| S3 | #283 | `898ff18b``89cf1e66` | Measured UNREACHABLE; permanent invariant instead of a restructure |
Connected Release gate (retail UI) on S1+S2: user verdict "works fine"; log
showed 9 completed reveals, 58 reveal events all `failures=0`, zero unhandled
exceptions, zero parked placements, graceful exit (`0c14c402`).
S3's probe run recorded zero disagreements across 11 reveals and six landblocks
spanning ~45 km, so ownership was deliberately left alone — the evidence
disproved the hypothesis, and the guard exists to keep it disproven.
Final complete Release solution: **10,844 passed / 4 skipped / 0 failed.**
Next: the original campaign order below, starting at C4 route 2.
## Why these first ## Why these first
Every one is an instance of the exact weakness the placement campaign exists to Every one is an instance of the exact weakness the placement campaign exists to